Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36402787›Full record

ArticleNature communications2022

Drivers of recent decline in dust activity over East Asia.

Chenglai Wu, Zhaohui Lin, Yaping Shao, Xiaohong Liu, Ying Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Arctic amplification-induced decline in West and South Asia dust warrants stronger antidesertification toward carbon neutrality.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Chenglai WuInternational Center for Climate and Environment Sciences, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100029, China. wuchenglai@mail.iap.ac.cn.ORCID 0000-0002-8397-2424
Zhaohui LinInternational Center for Climate and Environment Sciences, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100029, China. lzh@mail.iap.ac.cn.ORCID 0000-0003-1376-3106
Yaping ShaoInstitute for Geophysics and Meteorology, University of Cologne, Cologne, 50969, Germany.
Xiaohong LiuDepartment of Atmospheric Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77845, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3994-5955
Ying LiNational Climate Center, China Meteorological Administration, Beijing, 100081, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is essential to understand the factors driving the recent decline of dust activity in East Asia for future dust projections. Using a physically-based dust emission model, here we show that the weakening of surface wind and the increasing of vegetation cover and soil moisture have all contributed to the decline in dust activity during 2001 to 2017. The relative contributions of these three factors to the dust emission reduction during 2010-2017 relative to 2001 are 46%, 30%, and 24%, respectively. Much (78%) of the dust emission reduction is from barren lands, and a small fraction (4.6%) of the reduction is attributed to grassland vegetation increase that is partly ascribed to the ecological restoration. This suggests that the ecological restoration plays a minor role in the decline of dust activity. Rather, the decline is mainly driven by climatic factors, with the weakening of surface wind playing the dominant role.

Indexed as

DustEnvironmental MonitoringAsia, EasternSoilWindDustSoil

Identifiers

PMID36402787
PMCPMC9675820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.