Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36402768›Full record

ArticleNature communications2022

Deep learning to decompose macromolecules into independent Markovian domains.

Andreas Mardt, Tim Hempel, Cecilia Clementi, Frank Noé

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Andreas Mardt *Freie Universität Berlin, Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Berlin, Germany.
Tim Hempel *Freie Universität Berlin, Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0073-9353
Cecilia ClementiFreie Universität Berlin, Department of Physics, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9221-2358
Frank NoéFreie Universität Berlin, Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Berlin, Germany. franknoe@microsoft.com.ORCID 0000-0003-4169-9324

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The increasing interest in modeling the dynamics of ever larger proteins has revealed a fundamental problem with models that describe the molecular system as being in a global configuration state. This notion limits our ability to gather sufficient statistics of state probabilities or state-to-state transitions because for large molecular systems the number of metastable states grows exponentially with size. In this manuscript, we approach this challenge by introducing a method that combines our recent progress on independent Markov decomposition (IMD) with VAMPnets, a deep learning approach to Markov modeling. We establish a training objective that quantifies how well a given decomposition of the molecular system into independent subdomains with Markovian dynamics approximates the overall dynamics. By constructing an end-to-end learning framework, the decomposition into such subdomains and their individual Markov state models are simultaneously learned, providing a data-efficient and easily interpretable summary of the complex system dynamics. While learning the dynamical coupling between Markovian subdomains is still an open issue, the present results are a significant step towards learning Ising models of large molecular complexes from simulation data.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsDeep LearningComputer SimulationMacromolecular SubstancesMarkov ChainsMacromolecular Substances

Identifiers

PMID36402768
PMCPMC9675806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.