ArticleJournal of molecular biology2023
The Integration of Proteome-Wide PTM Data with Protein Structural and Sequence Features Identifies Phosphorylations that Mediate 14-3-3 Interactions.
Article in Journal of molecular biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- TNK1 is a targetable JAK-independent driver of STAT signaling and inflammation.Genes & development · 2026Article
- Kinesin Regulation in the Proximal Axon is Essential for Dendrite-selective Transport.Molecular biology of the cell · 2024Article
- 14-3-3 binding motif phosphorylation disrupts Hdac4-organized condensates to stimulate cardiac reprogramming.Cell reports · 2024Article
- Integrating Clinical Cancer and PTM Proteomics Data Identifies a Mechanism of ACK1 Kinase Activation.Molecular cancer research : MCR · 2024Article
- Kinase regulation by liquid-liquid phase separation.Trends in cell biology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
14-3-3s are abundant proteins that regulate essentially all aspects of cell biology, including cell cycle, motility, metabolism, and cell death. 14-3-3s work by docking to phosphorylated Ser/Thr residues on a large network of client proteins and modulating client protein function in a variety of ways. In recent years, aided by improvements in proteomics, the discovery of 14-3-3 client proteins has far outpaced our ability to understand the biological impact of individual 14-3-3 interactions. The rate-limiting step in this process is often the identification of the individual phospho-serines/threonines that mediate 14-3-3 binding, which are difficult to distinguish from other phospho-sites by sequence alone. Furthermore, trial-and-error molecular approaches to identify these phosphorylations are costly and can take months or years to identify even a single 14-3-3 docking site phosphorylation. To help overcome this challenge, we used machine learning to analyze predictive features of 14-3-3 binding sites. We found that accounting for intrinsic protein disorder and the unbiased mass spectrometry identification rate of a given phosphorylation significantly improves the identification of 14-3-3 docking site phosphorylations across the proteome. We incorporated these features, coupled with consensus sequence prediction, into a publicly available web app, called "14-3-3 site-finder". We demonstrate the strength of this approach through its ability to identify 14-3-3 binding sites that do not conform to the loose consensus sequence of 14-3-3 docking phosphorylations, which we validate with 14-3-3 client proteins, including TNK1, CHEK1, MAPK7, and others. In addition, by using this approach, we identify a phosphorylation on A-kinase anchor protein-13 (AKAP13) at Ser2467 that dominantly controls its interaction with 14-3-3.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.