ArticleDigestive diseases and sciences2023
Video-Based Deep Learning to Detect Dyssynergic Defecation with 3D High-Definition Anorectal Manometry.
Article in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Artificial Intelligence in Gastrointestinal Motility Diagnostics: A Systematic Review.Neurogastroenterology and motility · 2026Pooled it
- Current Status and Role of Artificial Intelligence in Anorectal Diseases and Pelvic Floor Disorders.JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic SurgeonsPooled it
- Artificial Intelligence in High-resolution Anorectal Manometry: Current Applications and Future Directions.Current gastroenterology reports · 2026Review
- Multicenter Validation of Video-based Deep Learning to Evaluate Defecation Patterns on 3-dimensional High-definition Anorectal Manometry.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2026Article
- Bionic concepts for assessment of defecatory function and dysfunction.Techniques in coloproctology · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence as a transforming factor in motility disorders-automatic detection of motility patterns in high-resolution anorectal manometry.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Feasibility of IAPWG protocol in performing high-definition three-dimensional anorectal manometry: A prospective, multicentric italian study.Techniques in coloproctology · 2024Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Coloproctology: A Review of Emerging Technologies and Clinical Applications.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Artificial Intelligence Tools for Improving Manometric Diagnosis of Esophageal Dysmotility.Current gastroenterology reports · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWe developed a deep learning algorithm to evaluate defecatory patterns to identify dyssynergic defecation using 3-dimensional high definition anal manometry (3D-HDAM).
aimsWe developed a 3D-HDAM deep learning algorithm to evaluate for dyssynergia.
methodsSpatial-temporal data were extracted from consecutive 3D-HDAM studies performed between 2018 and 2020 at Dartmouth-Hitchcock Health. The technical procedure and gold standard definition of dyssynergia were based on the London consensus, adapted to the needs of 3D-HDAM technology. Three machine learning models were generated: (1) traditional machine learning informed by conventional anorectal function metrics, (2) deep learning, and (3) a hybrid approach. Diagnostic accuracy was evaluated using bootstrap sampling to calculate area-under-the-curve (AUC). To evaluate overfitting, models were validated by adding 502 simulated defecation maneuvers with diagnostic ambiguity.
results302 3D-HDAM studies representing 1208 simulated defecation maneuvers were included (average age 55.2 years; 80.5% women). The deep learning model had comparable diagnostic accuracy [AUC 0.91 (95% confidence interval 0.89-0.93)] to traditional [AUC 0.93(0.92-0.95)] and hybrid [AUC 0.96(0.94-0.97)] predictive models in training cohorts. However, the deep learning model handled ambiguous tests more cautiously than other models; the deep learning model was more likely to designate an ambiguous test as inconclusive [odds ratio 4.21(2.78-6.38)] versus traditional/hybrid approaches.
conclusionsDeep learning is capable of considering complex spatial-temporal information on 3D-HDAM technology. Future studies are needed to evaluate the clinical context of these preliminary findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36401758What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.