ReviewMetabolic brain disease2023
Closing spontaneous portosystemic shunts in cirrhosis: Does it make sense? Does it work? What does it take?
Review in Metabolic brain disease, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- [The impact of spontaneous portosystemic shunt on clinical outcomes in patients with liver cirrhosis and hepatic encephalopathy].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2025Article
- Acute and non-acute decompensation of liver cirrhosis.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2025Review
- Effect of Daily Fiber Intake Among Cirrhotic Patients With and Without Portosystemic Shunts.Current developments in nutrition · 2025Article
- Safety and efficacy of interventional embolization in cirrhotic patients with refractory hepatic encephalopathy associated with spontaneous portosystemic shunts.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spontaneous portosystemic shunts (SPSS) are an often neglected cause of hepatic encephalopathy associated with cirrhosis. Nowadays, SPSS are considered as radiological biomarkers of clinically significant portal hypertension rather than the previous dogmatic perceived decompressive vessels. SPSS are not rare as they can be diagnosed in over 60% of the patients with cirrhosis by mere contrast-enhanced CT. Moreover, they are clinically relevant since they impact on all portal hypertensive related complications, in particular medically refractory HE, and represent an independent predictor of decompensation and mortality in cirrhosis, irrespective of the type of SPSS. Taken together, these elements warrant strategies to target these shunts directly which is currently is achieved via interventional radiology embolization. In this review, we discuss why it makes sense to tackle SPSS, how to do it and what it takes to do it right based on aggregated literature.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.