Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36401591›Full record

ReviewAddiction (Abingdon, England)2023

Clinical management of psychostimulant withdrawal: review of the evidence.

Michael J Li, Steven J Shoptaw

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Addiction (Abingdon, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. The Diagnosis and Treatment of Stimulant-Related Emergencies.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michael J LiDepartment of Family Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2457-604X
Steven J ShoptawDepartment of Family Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3583-0026
University of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

Project-004UG1DA020024 · NIDA · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI Steven J Shoptaw, MADHUKAR H. TRIVEDI · 2015 to 2026
$71.6M
UCLA Rapid, Relevant, Rigorous Implementation Science HubP30MH058107 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI Sung-Jae Lee · 1997 to 2026
$53.5M
Concept ProjectU10DA020024 · NIDA · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI TRIVEDI, MADHUKAR H. · 2005 to 2015
$22.6M
Trajectories of socially regulated gene expression, methamphetamine use, and viral load among HIV-positive men who have sex with men (MSM) receiving contingency managementK01DA051329 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI LI, MICHAEL JONATHAN · 2021 to 2025
$947k
NIDA NIH HHS K01 DA051329NIDA NIH HHS K01DA051329NIDA NIH HHS U10 DA020024NIDA NIH HHS UG1 DA020024NIDA NIH HHS UG1DA020024NIMH NIH HHS P30 MH058107NIMH NIH HHS P30MH58107
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is estimated that a majority of people who use psychostimulants, particularly methamphetamine (MA) and cocaine, experience withdrawal upon abstinence from sustained use. This review of clinical research reports the evidence regarding biomedical and behavioral treatments for psychostimulant withdrawal symptoms. It provides a framework for clinicians and scientists to increase impact on attenuating MA and cocaine withdrawal during initial and sustained abstinence. Articles reviewed included reports of controlled clinical trials (randomized or non-randomized) reporting at least one withdrawal symptom among the outcomes or specifically studying patients in withdrawal. Potential efficacy for MA withdrawal is noted for a few medications (mirtazapine, naltrexone, bupropion) and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation during acute (first week), early protracted (weeks 2-4) and late protracted (> 4 weeks) withdrawal phases. Topiramate shows mixed evidence of efficacy for cocaine withdrawal. In general, there is inconsistent signal for biomedical and behavioral treatments on MA and cocaine withdrawal.

Indexed as

Amphetamine-Related DisordersCentral Nervous System StimulantsCocaineMethamphetamineSubstance Withdrawal SyndromeHumansCentral Nervous System StimulantsCocaineMethamphetamineAmphetaminecocainemethamphetaminereviewtreatmentwithdrawal

Identifiers

PMID36401591
PMCPMC10069411
OpenAlexW4309411426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.