SynthesisMedicine2022
Association between microRNA-146a rs2910164 polymorphism and coronary heart disease: An updated meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genetic association of microRNA-146a polymorphisms with the severity of coronary artery lesions in acute myocardial infarction.PloS one · 2025Article
- A Review of MicroRNAs and lncRNAs in Atherosclerosis as Well as Some Major Inflammatory Conditions Affecting Atherosclerosis.Biomedicines · 2024Review
- An updated review on cell signaling pathways regulated by candidate miRNAs in coronary artery disease.Non-coding RNA research · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCoronary heart disease (CHD) is one of the manifestations of atherosclerosis with a high morbidity rate. MicroRNA (miRNA)-146a rs2910164, a single nucleotide polymorphism, is associated with the progression of CHD risk. However, the results are controversial and uncertain. Therefore, an updated meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the association between rs2910164 and CHD susceptibility.
methodsPubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Web of Science, China's National Knowledge Infrastructure, VIP, and Wan fang were searched for the eligible articles until April 30, 2022. The odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence interval (CIs) were calculated to assess the correlation. Bonferroni correction was utilized between multiple comparisons. Trial sequential analysis was performed to measure the required information size and assess the reliability of the meta-analysis results.
resultsA total of 18 eligible studies, including 6859 cases and 8469 controls, were analyzed in our meta-analysis. After Bonferroni correction, we found that the G allele at rs2910164 was associated with significantly decreased CHD risk in the allelic model (OR = 0.86), homozygous model (OR = 0.79), and heterozygous model (OR = 0.89) in total population. In the subgroup analysis, the subjects containing the G allele and GG genotype were associated with a lower risk of CHD in the Chinese population, not the GG + CG and CG genotype. In addition, under the allelic, homozygous, heterozygous, and dominant models, miR-146a rs2910164 was at lower CHD risk in the large size population except in the recessive model.
conclusionThese results show that miR-146a rs2910164 might be associated with lower CHD susceptibility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.