ArticleAnimal microbiome2022
Investigating the impact of database choice on the accuracy of metagenomic read classification for the rumen microbiome.
Article in Animal microbiome, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
36 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of a long-read amplicon sequencing approach to short-read amplicons for microbiome analysis.Microbiology spectrum · 2026Article
- MetagenomicKG: a knowledge graph for metagenomic applications.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Exploring shotgun metagenomic data to detect microeukaryotic pathogens in wildlife.BMC microbiology · 2026Article
- Profiling the Athletes' Gut Microbiome: A Critical Methodological Perspective on 16S Metabarcoding and Shotgun Metagenomics.Biology · 2026Review
- Picobirnavirus: how do you find where it's hiding?Critical reviews in microbiology · 2026Review
- A comparison of methods for the optimal recovery of the human fecal virome.ISME communications · 2026Article
- Review
- PUDU (pipeline for universal diversity unveiling): an accessible end-to-end workflow for taxonomic profiling and ecological visualization of environmental microbiomes across amplicon, shotgun, and long-read sequencing.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- A framework of Microbial Genomic Database for clinical metagenomic pathogen diagnosis: development and multi-cohort evaluation.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- Assessing sequencing-based pathogen surveillance of a recreational swimming area in Oslo, Norway.Access microbiology · 2026Article
- K-FluDB: a novel K-mer-based database for enhanced genomic surveillance of Influenza A viruses.Bioinformatics advances · 2026Article
- Article
- Targeted probe capture metagenomics-enabled surveillance of multidrug-resistant organisms and antimicrobial resistance genes in post-handwashing areas of public washrooms.Environmental microbiome · 2025Article
- The selective culture and enrichment of major rumen bacteria on three distinct anaerobic culture media.Microbiology spectrum · 2025Article
- Structure and Composition of Prey Communities Associated with Malaysian Mahseer,Tropical life sciences research · 2025Article
- Microbiota and kidney disease: the road ahead.Nature reviews. Nephrology · 2025Review
- Comparison of a long-read amplicon sequencing approach to short-read amplicons for microbiome analysis.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- The crosstalk between host and rumen microbiome in cattle: insights from multi-omics approaches and genome-wide association studies.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2025Review
- Best practices for the experimental design of one health studies on companion animal and owner microbiomes - From data collection to analysis.One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2025Review
- From air to insight: the evolution of airborne DNA sequencing technologies.Microbiology (Reading, England) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Microbiome analysis is quickly moving towards high-throughput methods such as metagenomic sequencing. Accurate taxonomic classification of metagenomic data relies on reference sequence databases, and their associated taxonomy. However, for understudied environments such as the rumen microbiome many sequences will be derived from novel or uncultured microbes that are not present in reference databases. As a result, taxonomic classification of metagenomic data from understudied environments may be inaccurate. To assess the accuracy of taxonomic read classification, this study classified metagenomic data that had been simulated from cultured rumen microbial genomes from the Hungate collection. To assess the impact of reference databases on the accuracy of taxonomic classification, the data was classified with Kraken 2 using several reference databases. We found that the choice and composition of reference database significantly impacted on taxonomic classification results, and accuracy. In particular, NCBI RefSeq proved to be a poor choice of database. Our results indicate that inaccurate read classification is likely to be a significant problem, affecting all studies that use insufficient reference databases. We observed that adding cultured reference genomes from the rumen to the reference database greatly improved classification rate and accuracy. We also demonstrated that metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs) have the potential to further enhance classification accuracy by representing uncultivated microbes, sequences of which would otherwise be unclassified or incorrectly classified. However, classification accuracy was strongly dependent on the taxonomic labels assigned to these MAGs. We therefore highlight the importance of accurate reference taxonomic information and suggest that, with formal taxonomic lineages, MAGs have the potential to improve classification rate and accuracy, particularly in environments such as the rumen that are understudied or contain many novel genomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.