Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36401287›Full record

ArticleBMC women's health2022

A misplacement of a ureteral stent into the abdominal aorta: a case report of a rare retrograde ureteral stenting complication.

Nebojsa Prijovic, Bojan Cegar, Vladimir Cvetic, Veljko Santric, Branko Stankovic, Jovan Radojevic

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in BMC women's health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Nebojsa PrijovicClinic of Urology, University Clinical Center of Serbia, Resavska 51, Belgrade, Serbia. nebojsa.prijovic@yahoo.com.ORCID 0000-0002-5268-5801
Bojan CegarClinic of Urology, University Clinical Center of Serbia, Resavska 51, Belgrade, Serbia.
Vladimir CveticFaculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Dr Subotica 8, Belgrade, Serbia.
Veljko SantricClinic of Urology, University Clinical Center of Serbia, Resavska 51, Belgrade, Serbia.
Branko StankovicClinic of Urology, University Clinical Center of Serbia, Resavska 51, Belgrade, Serbia.
Jovan RadojevicGeneral Hospital "Dr Radivoj Simonovic" Sombor, Vojvodjanska 75, Sombor, Serbia.
University of Belgrade · RSCentar za Promociju Nauke · RSVodovod-Kanalizacija (Slovenia) · SI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCervical cancer is often associated with malignant ureteral obstruction and consequent hydronephrosis. Hydronephrosis caused in this way can be resolved by placing ureteral stents or performing a percutaneous nephrostomy. Complications that may occur during the retrograde ureteral stent placement are usually mild, but serious complications such as stent migration into the cardiovascular system are also possible. Here we present an unusual case where a ureteral stent entered the abdominal aorta during the cystoscopic ureteral stenting, which was resolved by a cystoscopic stent removal kept in check by endovascular catheters. CASE PRESENTATIONS: The 48-year-old female patient was treated in the regional secondary healthcare facility due to bilateral hydronephrosis caused by cervical cancer. The patient had bilateral percutaneous nephrostomies and ureteral stents. Due to the calcification of the left ureteral stent, an urethrorenoscopy with lithotripsy of the calculus in the left ureter was performed in the regional secondary healthcare facility, and the ureteral stent was cystoscopically replaced. The control radiography of the urinary tract showed a misplacement of the left ureteral stent, and a computed tomography showed that the stent was located in the abdominal aorta. The patient was referred to the University Clinical Center of Serbia, where a ureteral stent was cystoscopically removed from the abdominal aorta under the control of endovascular catheters. The patient was in good general condition at all times, with no signs of bleeding, and she was discharged from the hospital on the fourth postoperative day.

conclusionsThe migration of a ureteral stent into the abdominal aorta and the cardiovascular system in general is a rare type of ureteral stenting complication whose treatment requires a multidisciplinary approach. In order to prevent such complications, it is necessary to strictly adhere to the indications for the ureteral stent placement in the case of malignant ureteral obstruction. Also, this procedure should be performed according to the current guidelines and controlled by an X-ray or ultrasound.

Indexed as

HydronephrosisUreterUreteral ObstructionUterine Cervical NeoplasmsAorta, AbdominalFemaleHumansMiddle AgedStentsAbdominal aortaComplicationHydronephrosisUreteral stent

Identifiers

PMID36401287
PMCPMC9673339
OpenAlexW4309466941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.