Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36401235›Full record

ArticleBMC pulmonary medicine2022

A cross-sectional survey on the lung ultrasound training and practice of respiratory therapists in mainland China.

Kai Liu, Yu-Long Yao, Yu-Xian Wang, Bi-Lin Wei, Liu-Cun Li, Qi-Xing Wang, Hui-Qing Ge, Er-Shan Wang, Li-Min Yang, Huan Chen and 7 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pulmonary medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Lung ultrasound in respiratory therapy: a global reflective survey.Multidisciplinary respiratory medicine · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Kai Liu *Department of Critical Care Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Yu-Long Yao *Department of Critical Care Medicine, School of Medicine, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Yu-Xian Wang *Department of Critical Care Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Bi-Lin WeiDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Liu-Cun LiDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
Qi-Xing WangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Hui-Qing GeDepartment of Respiratory Care, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Er-Shan WangDepartment of Respiratory Care, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Li-Min YangDepartment of Respiratory Care, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Huan ChenDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Yun-Qing YangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Hao QinDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Shanghai Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Wen-Jun ZhaiDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, School of Clinical Medicine, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Shen-Ji YuDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Xiao-Ting WangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China. icuting@163.com.
Zhe LuoDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China. luo.zhe@zs-hospital.sh.cn.
Guo-Wei TuDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032, China. tu.guowei@zs-hospital.sh.cn.

Funding

Clinical Research Project of Zhongshan Hospital 2020ZSLC27Clinical Research Project of Zhongshan Hospital 2020ZSLC38Foundation for Young Researchers of Zhongshan Hospital 2021ZSQN22National Natural Science Foundation of China 82070085Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai 20ZR1411100Program of Shanghai Academic/Technology Research Leader 20XD1421000Project for the elite backbone of Zhongshan Hospital 2021ZSGG06
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis national study aimed to investigate the lung ultrasound (LUS) training and practice of respiratory therapists (RTs) in mainland China.

methodsA cross-sectional multicenter survey was conducted from May 22, 2021 to August 12, 2021, through online platforms. This survey included RTs in mainland China. The survey was divided into four sections: (1) demographic characteristics and basic information; (2) basic information about LUS training and practice; (3) LUS practice details; and (4) Other ultrasound training and practice.

resultsA total of 514 responses were received, and 494 valid responses were included in the analysis. 81.2% (401/494) participants' highest degree of education was a bachelor's degree, and 43.1% (213/494) participants were at level II in terms of job ranking. 99.2%(490/494) participants agreed that the RTs needed to learn lung ultrasound, but only 12.3% (61/494) participants had received a LUS training course. Further, 66.2% (327/494) experienced participants responded to Sect. 3. Most of RTs used LUS when the patient had hypoxia (265/327, 81%) or dyspnea (260/317, 79.5%); they also used it during spontaneous breathing trial(SBT) (191/327, 58.4%) or in prone position (177/327, 54.1%). The A-line (302/327, 92.4%), B-line (299/327, 91.4%), lung slide (263/327, 80.4%), and bat sign (259/327, 79.2%) were well known as LUS signs. Also, 30.6% (100/327) participants did not use the LUS protocol in their clinical practice, and only 25.4%(83/327) participants said they had used LUS scores. Moreover, 55.7% (182/327) participants frequently changed the respiratory therapy strategy according to LUS results.

conclusionsWe should improve the number and workplace of RTs in mainland China in the future. We should also standardize the application of LUS practice and training for RTs in mainland China and establish corresponding certification pathways.

Indexed as

LungLung DiseasesCross-Sectional StudiesHumansRespiratory TherapyUltrasonographyLung ultrasoundMainland ChinaPracticeRespiratory therapistTraining

Identifiers

PMID36401235
PMCPMC9672549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.