Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36401197›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2022

Healthcare utilization after mass trauma: a register-based study of consultations with primary care and mental health services in survivors of terrorism.

Lise Eilin Stene, Siri Thoresen, Tore Wentzel-Larsen, Grete Dyb

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lise Eilin SteneNorwegian Centre for Violence and Traumatic Stress Studies (NKVTS), Gullhaugveien 1-3, NO-0484, Oslo, Norway. l.e.stene@nkvts.no.
Siri ThoresenNorwegian Centre for Violence and Traumatic Stress Studies (NKVTS), Gullhaugveien 1-3, NO-0484, Oslo, Norway.
Tore Wentzel-LarsenNorwegian Centre for Violence and Traumatic Stress Studies (NKVTS), Gullhaugveien 1-3, NO-0484, Oslo, Norway.
Grete DybNorwegian Centre for Violence and Traumatic Stress Studies (NKVTS), Gullhaugveien 1-3, NO-0484, Oslo, Norway.
Norwegian Centre for Violence and Traumatic Stress Studies · NOUniversity of Oslo · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundKnowledge on healthcare utilization after mass trauma is needed to strengthen the public health preparedness to such incidents. Using register-based data, this study had a unique opportunity to investigate how young survivors' use of primary care physicians (PCP) and mental health services (MHS) changed after a terrorist attack.

methodsWe examined register-based data on PCP and MHS consultations among 255 survivors (52% male) of the 2011 Utøya youth camp attack in Norway 3 years before and after the attack, and their reason for encounter with the PCP according to the International Classification for Primary Care (ICPC- 2).

resultsThe PCP and MHS consultation rates (CR) were higher in female than male survivors both acutely and at long-term. The mean yearly CRs increased from 2.25 to 4.41 for PCP and 1.77 to 13.59 for MHS the year before and after the attack in female survivors, and from 1.45 to 3.65 for PCP and 1.02 to 11.77 for MHS in male survivors. The third year post-attack CRs for PCP were 3.55 and 2.00; and CRs for MHS were 5.24 and 2.30 in female and male survivors, respectively. Among female survivors, 76% consulted PCP and 12% MHS the year preceding the attack; post-attack 93% consulted PCP and 73% MHS the first year; decreasing to 87 and 40% the third year. Among male survivors, 61% consulted PCP and 7% MHS the year preceding the attack; post-attack 86% consulted PCP and 61% MHS the first year, and 67 and 31% the third year. As for PCP consultations, there was a particular increase in psychological reasons for encounter following the attack.

conclusionsThis study indicates that it is important to anticipate an increased healthcare utilization several years following mass trauma, particularly of MHS. Both PCP and MHS practitioners played important roles in providing healthcare for psychological problems in young survivors of terrorism in a country with universal and largely publicly financed healthcare and a gatekeeping system. The healthcare utilization could be different in countries with other health systems or psychosocial care responses to mass trauma.

Indexed as

Mental Health ServicesStress Disorders, Post-TraumaticTerrorismAdolescentFemaleHumansMalePatient Acceptance of Health CarePrimary Health CareReferral and ConsultationSurvivorsAdolescentCrisis InterventionDisaster PlanningEmergenciesHealth Services ResearchMass Casualty IncidentsPsychological TraumaStress Disorders, Post-TraumaticStress, PsychologicalTerrorism

Identifiers

PMID36401197
PMCPMC9675057
OpenAlexW4309561525

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.