Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36401195›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2022

The experiences and perceptions of female breast cancer patients regarding weight management during and after treatment for oestrogen-receptor positive disease: a qualitative study.

Saxton Jm, Pickering K, Wane S, Crank H, Anderson As, Cain H, Cohen J, Copeland Rj, Gray J, Hargreaves J and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Beyond breast cancer: mapping unmet needs and advancing an evidence-based framework of survivorship care.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Review
  3. Barriers to timely nutrition support in patients with cancer: A scoping review.Nutrition in clinical practice : official publication of the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Saxton Jm *School of Sport, Exercise & Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Hull, Cottingham Road, Hull, HU6 7RX, UK. john.saxton@hull.ac.uk.
Pickering KAdvanced Wellbeing Research Centre, Sheffield Hallam University, Olympic Legacy Park 2 Old Hall Rd, Sheffield, S9 3TU, UK.
Wane SDepartment of Sport, Exercise & Rehabilitation, Northumbria University, City Campus, Newcastle-Upon-Tyne, NE1 8ST, UK.
Crank HAcademy of Sport and Physical Activity, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, S10 2BP, UK.
Anderson AsDivision of Population Health & Genomics, Centre for Research Into Cancer Prevention and Screening, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, University of Dundee, Dundee, DD1 9SY, UK.
Cain HNewcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Victoria Road, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE1 4LP, UK.
Cohen JYork Medical School, Hull Heath Trials Unit, University of Hull, Cottingham Road, Hull, HU6 7RX, UK.
Copeland RjAdvanced Wellbeing Research Centre, Sheffield Hallam University, Olympic Legacy Park 2 Old Hall Rd, Sheffield, S9 3TU, UK.
Gray JDepartment of Nursing, Midwifery & Health, Northumbria University, Coach Lane Campus, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE7 7XA, UK.
Hargreaves JCarnegie School of Sport, Leeds Beckett University, 9 Fairfax Hall, Headingley Campus, Leeds, LS6 3QS, UK.
McNally RjqPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University GB, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, UK.
Wilson C *Department of Oncology and Metabolism, The Medical School, University of Sheffield, Beech Hill Road, Sheffield, S10 2RX, UK.
Sheffield Hallam University · GBNorthumbria University · GBHull York Medical School · GBLeeds Beckett University · GBNewcastle University · GBNewcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Dundee · GBUniversity of Hull · GBUniversity of Sheffield · GB

Funding

Yorkshire Cancer Research NOR416
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWeight gain is commonly observed during and after breast cancer treatment and is associated with poorer survival outcomes, notably in women with oestrogen-receptor positive disease. The aim of this qualitative study was to investigate the experiences and perceptions of oestrogen-receptor positive (ER +) female breast cancer patients (BCPs) regarding weight management behaviours during and after treatment. Secondly, to gain insight into the experiences of healthcare professionals (HCPs) regarding the provision of weight management advice to patients undergoing treatment.

methodsFour focus groups involving 16 BCPs having a median (range) age of 51 (35-70 y) and three focus groups involving 21 HCPs aged 46 (29-62) were held at a university campus, local cancer support centre or clinical site. Data were analysed using Framework analysis.

resultsFour overarching themes (and 10 subthemes) were identified: (1) Treatment; (2) Support for lifestyle behaviour change; (3) Information availability for BCPs; (4) Knowledge of current evidence amongst HCPs. The physical and psychological consequences of treatment influenced motivation for weight management amongst BCPs. Social support for health promoting behaviours was viewed as important but was conflicting, requiring context-specific considerations. BCPs said they would have welcomed access to credible information (guided by HCPs) about the potential detrimental health effects of excess body weight and weight gain, together with advice on weight management via healthy eating and physical activity. HCPs felt that they had insufficient knowledge of public health dietary and physical activity recommendations or evidence-based interventions to confidently offer such advice. HCPs expressed concern that raising weight management issues would exacerbate distress or invoke feelings of guilt amongst BCPs, and cited time pressures on patient consultations as additional barriers to providing weight management support.

conclusionThe study yielded novel insights into factors influencing weight management behaviours amongst overweight ER + BCPs. The results suggest that evidence-based information and support, which addresses key physical and psychological challenges to physical activity and dietary behaviours, offers the best route to sustainable weight management in this population.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsEstrogensFemaleHumansOverweightQualitative ResearchWeight GainEstrogensBarriers and facilitatorsBreast CancerHormone-positiveWeight management

Identifiers

PMID36401195
PMCPMC9675095
OpenAlexW4309562331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.