Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36401105›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2023

Impact of shifting from laparoscopic to robotic surgery during 600 minimally invasive pancreatic and liver resections.

Anouk M L H Emmen, B Görgec, M J W Zwart, F Daams, J Erdmann, S Festen, D J Gouma, T M van Gulik, J van Hilst, G Kazemier and 8 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 20 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Anouk M L H EmmenDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
B GörgecDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
M J W ZwartDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
F DaamsCancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J ErdmannDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
S FestenDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
D J GoumaDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
T M van GulikDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J van HilstDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
G KazemierCancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
S LofDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
S I SussenbachDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
P J TanisDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
B M ZonderhuisCancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
O R BuschDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
R J SwijnenburgDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
M G BesselinkDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. m.g.besselink@amsterdamUMC.nl.
for HPB-Amsterdam
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NLDutch Cancer Society · NLOLVG · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany centers worldwide are shifting from laparoscopic to robotic minimally invasive hepato-pancreato-biliary resections (MIS-HPB) but large single center series assessing this process are lacking. We hypothesized that the introduction of robot-assisted surgery was safe and feasible in a high-volume center.

methodsSingle center, post-hoc assessment of prospectively collected data including all consecutive MIS-HPB resections (January 2010-February 2022). As of December 2018, all MIS pancreatoduodenectomy and liver resections were robot-assisted. All surgeons had participated in dedicated training programs for laparoscopic and robotic MIS-HPB. Primary outcomes were in-hospital/30-day mortality and Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3 complications.

resultsAmong 1875 pancreatic and liver resections, 600 (32%) were MIS-HPB resections. The overall rate of conversion was 4.3%, Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3 complications 25.7%, and in-hospital/30-day mortality 1.8% (n = 11). When comparing the period before and after the introduction of robotic MIS-HPB (Dec 2018), the overall use of MIS-HPB increased from 25.3 to 43.8% (P < 0.001) and blood loss decreased from 250 ml [IQR 100-500] to 150 ml [IQR 50-300] (P < 0.001). The 291 MIS pancreatic resections included 163 MIS pancreatoduodenectomies (52 laparoscopic, 111 robotic) with 4.3% conversion rate. The implementation of robotic pancreatoduodenectomy was associated with reduced operation time (450 vs 361 min; P < 0.001), reduced blood loss (350 vs 200 ml; P < 0.001), and a decreased rate of delayed gastric emptying (28.8% vs 9.9%; P = 0.009). The 309 MIS liver resections included 198 laparoscopic and 111 robotic procedures with a 3.6% conversion rate. The implementation of robotic liver resection was associated with less overall complications (24.7% vs 10.8%; P = 0.003) and shorter hospital stay (4 vs 3 days; P < 0.001).

conclusionThe introduction of robotic surgery was associated with greater implementation of MIS-HPB in up to nearly half of all pancreatic and liver resections. Although mortality and major morbidity were not affected, robotic surgery was associated with improvements in some selected outcomes. Ultimately, randomized studies and high-quality registries should determine its added value.

Indexed as

LaparoscopyRobotic Surgical ProceduresHepatectomyHumansLiverMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresPancreasPostoperative ComplicationsProspective StudiesDistal pancreatectomyLiver surgeryMinimally invasivePancreatoduodenectomy

Identifiers

PMID36401105
PMCPMC10082117
OpenAlexW4309410175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.