Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36401071›Full record

ArticleReproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.)2023

Understanding the Reasons Why Men and Women Do Not Donate Gametes.

Stephen Whyte, Ho Fai Chan, Nikita Ferguson, Megan Godwin, Karin Hammarberg, Benno Torgler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Stephen WhyteSchool of Economics and Finance, Queensland University of Technology, Gardens Point, 2 George St, Brisbane, QLD 4001, Australia. sg.whyte@qut.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-9464-1110
Ho Fai ChanSchool of Economics and Finance, Queensland University of Technology, Gardens Point, 2 George St, Brisbane, QLD 4001, Australia.
Nikita FergusonSchool of Economics and Finance, Queensland University of Technology, Gardens Point, 2 George St, Brisbane, QLD 4001, Australia.
Megan GodwinCentre for Behavioural Economics, Society and Technology, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia.
Karin HammarbergSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, 549 St Kilda Rd, Melbourne, Victoria, 3004, Australia.
Benno TorglerSchool of Economics and Finance, Queensland University of Technology, Gardens Point, 2 George St, Brisbane, QLD 4001, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The global under-supply of sperm and oocyte donors is a serious concern for assisted reproductive medicine. Research has explored self-selected populations of gamete donors and their ex-post rationalisations of why they chose to donate. However, such studies may not provide the necessary insight into why the majority of people do not donate. Utilising the unique open form responses of a large sample (n = 1035) of online survey respondents, we examine the reasons participants cite when asked: "Why haven't you donated your sperm/eggs?." We categorise these responses into four core themes (conditional willingness, barriers, unconsidered, and conscientious objector) and eleven lower-order themes. We find that, on average, women are more conditionally willing (8.2% difference; p = 0.008) to participate in gamete donation than men. We also find that women are more likely than men to justify their non-donation based on their reproductive history (21.3% difference; p = 0.000) or kin selection and inclusive fitness (5.7% difference; p = 0.008). However, compared to women, men are more likely to validate their non-donation based on sociocultural or social norms (6% difference; p = 0.000) or religion (1.7% difference; p = 0.030). That so many of our study participants report in-principal willingness for future participation in gamete donation speaks to the need for increased research on understanding non-donor population preferences, motivations, and behaviours.

Indexed as

Oocyte DonationSemenFemaleHumansMaleOocytesSpermatozoaSurveys and QuestionnairesTissue DonorsBarriersDonationOocyteSex differenceSpermWillingness

Identifiers

PMID36401071
PMCPMC10160187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.