Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36401054›Full record

ReviewClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico2023

HIPEC with CRS versus cytoreductive surgery (CRS) for the gastric cancer metastasis to peritoneum.

Zhuming Chen, Muhammad Ali, Zhe Kai, Yang Wang, Chaohui Wang

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Asian consensus on normothermic intraperitoneal and systemic treatment for gastric cancer with peritoneal metastasis.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Prospects of Synergy: Local Interventions and CAR T Cell Therapy in Solid Tumors.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2024
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Zhuming Chen *Department of General Surgery, Anqing First People's Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Muhammad Ali *Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital Affiliated to Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, 225001, China.
Zhe KaiDepartment of General Surgery, Anqing First People's Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Yang WangNorthern Jiangsu People's Hospital Affiliated to Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, 225001, China.
Chaohui WangDepartment of General Surgery, Anqing First People's Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China. dralishah512@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3226-1654
Anhui Medical University · CNNorthern Jiangsu People's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeritoneal metastases (PM) have a poor prognosis in gastric cancer (GC). Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) gives favorable outcomes, but the influence of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) remains contentious. We designed to distinguish results between CRS versus HIPEC-CRS in patients with peritoneal metastases from gastric cancer. MATERIALS AND

methodsPubMed, Scopus, Embase and Cochrane library accessed to collect data and language is restricted to English. RevMan 5.4 was used to perform statistical analysis. The outcomes for categorical variables are mentioned in the risk ratio.

resultsTen trials involving 1367 patients in which 707 were CRS-HIPEC, while 660 CRS. We got significant results in 3rd year survival (P < 0.05), while 1st and 5th years are not statistically significant P > 0.05.

conclusionTo compare with CRS, CRS-HIPEC has improved survival rate in deprived of further morbidity or mortality.

Indexed as

Hyperthermia, InducedPeritoneal NeoplasmsStomach NeoplasmsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCombined Modality TherapyCytoreduction Surgical ProceduresHumansHyperthermic Intraperitoneal ChemotherapyPeritoneumSurvival RateGastrectomy and gastric cancerHyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapyPeritoneal metastasis

Identifiers

PMID36401054
OpenAlexW4309412559

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.