Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36400992›Full record

ReviewNature chemical biology2022

Molecular and environmental determinants of biomolecular condensate formation.

José A Villegas, Meta Heidenreich, Emmanuel D Levy

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature chemical biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Protein oxidation in crowded environments.The Biochemical journal · 2026
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Stimuli-triggered formation ofCell biomaterials · 2026
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Driving forces of RNA condensation revealed through coarse-grained modeling with explicit MgProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

José A VillegasDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA. josev@uic.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-4488-347X
Meta HeidenreichDepartment of Chemical and Structural Biology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel.
Emmanuel D LevyDepartment of Chemical and Structural Biology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel. emmanuel.levy@weizmann.ac.il.ORCID 0000-0001-8959-7365

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biomolecular condensate formation has been implicated in a host of biological processes and has found relevance in biology and disease. Understanding the physical principles and underlying characteristics of how these macromolecular assemblies form and are regulated has become a central focus of the field. In this Review, we introduce features of phase-separating biomolecules from a general physical viewpoint and highlight how molecular features, including affinity, valence and a competition between inter- and intramolecular contacts, affect phase separation. We then discuss sequence properties of proteins that serve to mediate intermolecular interactions. Finally, we review how the intracellular environment can affect structural and sequence determinants of proteins and modulate physical parameters of their phase transitions. The works reviewed highlight that a complex interplay exists between structure, sequence and environmental determinants in the formation of biomolecular condensates.

Indexed as

Biomolecular CondensatesMacromolecular SubstancesPhase TransitionMacromolecular Substances

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.