Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36400876›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

The diagnostic and prognostic potential of the EGFR/MUC4/MMP9 axis in glioma patients.

Agathe Quesnel, Nathan Coles, Tuomo M Polvikoski, George S Karagiannis, Claudio Angione, Meez Islam, Ahmad A Khundakar, Panagiota S Filippou

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Frontiers in immunology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Agathe QuesnelSchool of Health & Life Sciences, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, TS1 3BX, UK.
Nathan ColesSchool of Health & Life Sciences, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, TS1 3BX, UK.
Tuomo M PolvikoskiTranslational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.
George S KaragiannisDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.
Claudio AngioneNational Horizons Centre, Teesside University, 38 John Dixon Ln, Darlington, DL1 1HG, UK.
Meez IslamSchool of Health & Life Sciences, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, TS1 3BX, UK.
Ahmad A KhundakarSchool of Health & Life Sciences, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, TS1 3BX, UK.
Panagiota S FilippouSchool of Health & Life Sciences, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, TS1 3BX, UK. P.Philippou@tees.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-3974-988X
Teesside University · GBNewcastle University · GBAlbert Einstein College of Medicine · US

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/N005872/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glioblastoma is the most aggressive form of brain cancer, presenting poor prognosis despite current advances in treatment. There is therefore an urgent need for novel biomarkers and therapeutic targets. Interactions between mucin 4 (MUC4) and the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) are involved in carcinogenesis, and may lead to matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP9) overexpression, exacerbating cancer cell invasiveness. In this study, the role of MUC4, MMP9, and EGFR in the progression and clinical outcome of glioma patients was investigated. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) and immunofluorescence (IF) in fixed tissue samples of glioma patients were used to evaluate the expression and localization of EGFR, MMP9, and MUC4. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was also performed to test the prognostic utility of the proteins for glioma patients. The protein levels were assessed with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in serum of glioma patients, to further investigate their potential as non-invasive serum biomarkers. We demonstrated that MUC4 and MMP9 are both significantly upregulated during glioma progression. Moreover, MUC4 is co-expressed with MMP9 and EGFR in the proliferative microvasculature of glioblastoma, suggesting a potential role for MUC4 in microvascular proliferation and angiogenesis. The combined high expression of MUC4/MMP9, and MUC4/MMP9/EGFR was associated with poor overall survival (OS). Finally, MMP9 mean protein level was significantly higher in the serum of glioblastoma compared with grade III glioma patients, whereas MUC4 mean protein level was minimally elevated in higher glioma grades (III and IV) compared with control. Our results suggest that MUC4, along with MMP9, might account for glioblastoma progression, representing potential therapeutic targets, and suggesting the 'MUC4/MMP9/EGFR axis' may play a vital role in glioblastoma diagnostics.

Indexed as

GlioblastomaGliomaBiomarkersErbB ReceptorsHumansMatrix Metalloproteinase 9Mucin-4PrognosisBiomarkersEGFR protein, humanErbB ReceptorsMatrix Metalloproteinase 9MMP9 protein, humanMUC4 protein, humanMucin-4

Identifiers

PMID36400876
PMCPMC9674618
OpenAlexW4309326697

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.