Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36400871›Full record

ArticleArchives of microbiology2022

Chicken embryos are a valuable model for the selection of Bacillus subtilis for probiotic purposes.

Thais Fernanda Martins Dos Reis, Patricia Giovana Hoepers, Vasco Ariston de Carvalho Azevedo, Gabriela Ribeiro da Silva, Fabiana Oliveira Notário, Maria Cecília Soares, André Eduardo Schlemper, Ícaro Mendonça Costa, Nina Dias Coelho-Rocha, Mylla Spirandelli da Costa and 5 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Advancing the Understanding of the Mo-CBPProbiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Thais Fernanda Martins Dos Reis *School of Veterinary Medicine, Federal University of Uberlândia, Uberlândia, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9516-3640
Patricia Giovana Hoepers *School of Veterinary Medicine, Federal University of Uberlândia, Uberlândia, Brazil. patriciag.hoepers@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0109-9810
Vasco Ariston de Carvalho AzevedoGraduate Program in Genetics at the Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Gabriela Ribeiro da SilvaSchool of Veterinary Medicine, Federal University of Uberlândia, Uberlândia, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6633-3778
Fabiana Oliveira NotárioSchool of Veterinary Medicine, Federal University of Uberlândia, Uberlândia, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1093-3392
Maria Cecília SoaresSchool of Veterinary Medicine, Federal University of Uberlândia, Uberlândia, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6363-8763
André Eduardo SchlemperSchool of Veterinary Medicine, Federal University of Uberlândia, Uberlândia, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0841-9485
Ícaro Mendonça CostaSchool of Veterinary Medicine, Federal University of Uberlândia, Uberlândia, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4967-8157
Nina Dias Coelho-RochaGraduate Program in Genetics at the Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6941-9876
Mylla Spirandelli da CostaGraduate Program in Genetics and Biochemistry at the Federal University of Uberlândia, Uberlândia, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3729-0585
Simone SommerfeldSchool of Veterinary Medicine, Federal University of Uberlândia, Uberlândia, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1882-4158
Alessandra Aparecida Medeiros-RonchiSchool of Veterinary Medicine, Federal University of Uberlândia, Uberlândia, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0629-4145
Daise Aparecida RossiSchool of Veterinary Medicine, Federal University of Uberlândia, Uberlândia, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2003-696X
Igor Paula de CastroSchool of Veterinary Medicine, Federal University of Uberlândia, Uberlândia, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0655-0399
Belchiolina Beatriz FonsecaSchool of Veterinary Medicine, Federal University of Uberlândia, Uberlândia, Brazil. biafonseca@ufu.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8485-078X
Universidade Federal de Uberlândia · BRUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BR

Funding

This research was funded by the National Institute of Science and Technology in Theranostics and Nanobiotechnology - INCT-Teranano (CNPq/CAPES/FAPEMIG, Grant # CNPq-403193/2022-2, FAPEMIG Processo nº CBB - APQ-03613-17) . CNPq-403193/2022-2, FAPEMIG Processo nº CBB - APQ-03613-17
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacillus subtilis (BS) has been used as an excellent probiotic; however, some BS strains seem to be opportunist pathogens or do not present inhibitory effects in the pathogenic bacteria, so the characterization of BS strains for use in animals is mandatory. This study aimed to select nonpathogenic strains of BS, which can inhibit Salmonella spp., avian pathogenic Escherichia coli (APEC), and Campylobacter jejuni (CJ) using a chicken embryo as a model. We tested nine (9) strains of BS isolated from several sources (named A to I) in in vitro by tests of mucin degradation activity, haemolytic activity, apoptosis, and necrosis in fibroblasts from chickens. After the in vitro test, we tested the remaining seven (7) strains (strains A to G) in a chicken embryo (CE) as an in vivo model and target animal. We inoculated 3 log CFU/CE of each strain via allantoic fluid at the 10th day postincubation (DPI). Each treatment group consisted of eight CEs. At the 17th DPI we checked CE mortality, gross lesions, CE weight, and whether BS strains were still viable. To perform the cytokine, total protein, albumin, and reactive C protein analysis, we collected the CE blood from the allantoic vessel and intestine fragments in the duodenum portion for histomorphometric analysis. After the results in CEs, we tested the inhibition capacity of the selected BS strains for diverse strains of Salmonella  Heidelberg (SH), S. Typhimurium (ST), S. Enteritidis (SE), S. Minnesota (SM), S. Infantis (SI), Salmonella var. monophasic (SVM), APEC and C. jejuni. After the in vitro trial (mucin degradation activity, haemolytic activity, apoptosis, and necrosis), we removed two (2) strains (H and I) that showed β-haemolysis, mucin degradation, and/or high apoptosis and necrosis effects. Although all strains of BS were viable in CEs at the 17th DPI, we removed four (4) strains (A, B, D, F) once they led to the highest mortality in CEs or a high albumin/protein ratio. C. jejuni inoculated with strain G had greater weight than the commercial strain, which could be further used for egg inoculation with benefits to the CE. From the tests in CEs, we selected the strains C, E, and G for their ability to inhibit pathogenic strains of relevant foodborne pathogens. We found that the inhibition effect was strain dependent. In general, strains E and/or G presented better or similar results than commercial control strains in the inhibition of SH, ST, SI, APEC, and two (2) strains of CJ. In this study, we selected BS strains C, E and G due to their in vitro and in vivo safety and beneficial effects. In addition, we emphasize the value of CE as an in vivo experimental model for assessing BS's safety and possible benefits for poultry and other animals.

Indexed as

Campylobacter jejuniEscherichia coli InfectionsProbioticsAnimalsBacillus subtilisChick EmbryoChickensEscherichia coliMucinsNecrosisSalmonellaMucinsAPECCampylobacterChicken embryoProbioticSalmonella

Identifiers

PMID36400871
OpenAlexW4309662585

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.