Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36400817›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Comparison of two isolation methods of tobacco-derived extracellular vesicles, their characterization and uptake by plant and rat cells.

Michaela Kocholata, Michaela Prusova, Hana Auer Malinska, Jan Maly, Olga Janouskova

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Current issues in molecular biology · 2025
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Michaela KocholataCentre for Nanomaterials and Biotechnology, Faculty of Science, Jan Evangelista Purkyne University in Usti nad Labem, Usti nad Labem, Czech Republic. kocholata.michaela@gmail.com.
Michaela PrusovaCentre for Nanomaterials and Biotechnology, Faculty of Science, Jan Evangelista Purkyne University in Usti nad Labem, Usti nad Labem, Czech Republic.
Hana Auer MalinskaDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Science, Jan Evangelista Purkyne University in Usti nad Labem, Usti nad Labem, Czech Republic.
Jan MalyCentre for Nanomaterials and Biotechnology, Faculty of Science, Jan Evangelista Purkyne University in Usti nad Labem, Usti nad Labem, Czech Republic.
Olga JanouskovaCentre for Nanomaterials and Biotechnology, Faculty of Science, Jan Evangelista Purkyne University in Usti nad Labem, Usti nad Labem, Czech Republic.

Funding

Grantová Agentura České Republiky 20-21421S
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant extracellular vesicles (pEVs) derived from numerous edible sources gain a lot of attention in recent years, mainly due to the potential to efficiently carry bioactive molecules into mammalian cells. In the present study, we focus on isolation of PDNVs (plant-derived nanovesicles) and pEVs from callus culture and from BY-2 culture of Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco). Tobacco was selected as a source of plant vesicles, as it is commonly used by human, moreover it is a model organism with established techniques for cultivation of explant cultures in vitro. Explant cultures are suitable for the isolation of pEVs in large quantities, due to their fast growth in sterile conditions. As the efficiency of isolation methods varies, we were comparing two methods of isolation. We evaluated biophysical and biochemical properties of plant vesicles, as well as differences between isolates. We encountered difficulties in the form of vesicles aggregation, which is often described in publications focused on mammalian nanovesicles. In an effort to prevent vesicle aggregation, we used trehalose in different stages of isolation. We show tobacco-derived vesicles successfully enter tobacco and mesenchymal cell lines. We observed that tobacco-nanovesicles isolated by different methods incorporated fluorescent dye with different efficiency. The results of our study show tobacco-derived vesicles isolated by various isolation methods are able to enter plant, as well as mammalian cells.

Indexed as

Extracellular VesiclesMesenchymal Stem CellsAnimalsBiological TransportHumansMammalsNicotianaPlantsRats

Identifiers

PMID36400817
PMCPMC9674704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.