SynthesisBMJ open2022
Integrating patient values and preferences in healthcare: a systematic review of qualitative evidence.
Synthesis in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
64 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 84 citations in OpenAlex.
- Social Network Interventions for Improving Dietary Adherence Among Adults With Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review.Nutrition reviews · 2026Pooled it
- A Systematic Review of Attributes Influencing Preferences for Treatments and Interventions in People With Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS).Muscle & nerve · 2025Pooled it
- Shared decision-making in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review of patients' preferences and healthcare providers' perspectives.BMC health services research · 2025Pooled it
- Shared decision-making with patients with limited health literacy - experiences and needs of GPs regarding values clarification.Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2026Article
- Aligning Priorities of Surgeons and Patients Regarding Obesity and Joint Replacement: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee Codesigning Solutions Regarding Obesity and Arthroplasty Consensus Working Group.Arthroplasty today · 2026Article
- Challenges and Burdens in Refractory Chronic Cough: Patients' and Physicians' Perspectives.Pulmonary therapy · 2026Review
- Article
- Patient Preferences for Treatment Attributes in Moderate to Severe Chronic Hand Eczema: A Discrete Choice Experiment.Dermatology and therapy · 2026Article
- Discharge Learning Needs and Associated Factors Among Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery: A Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of clinical nursing · 2026Observational
- Knowledge of Complementary Medicine and Therapies Among Family Physicians and the General Population in Saudi Arabia.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Integrating family values into antenatal consultations: An observational study on structured communication training curriculum for neonatal care providers.World journal of clinical pediatrics · 2026Article
- Why evidence struggles to shape musculoskeletal health care and surgical practice in Australia: insights from an Australian clinician survey.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Perceptions of terminology among individuals known to oncology services: a cross sectional survey.Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice · 2026Article
- Personalized Decision-Making in Periodontal Therapy: Systemic and Demographic Factors Influencing Surgical vs. Non-Surgical Re-Treatment.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Article
- Resilience in people with severe mental illness and cancer, a qualitative study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Article
- Patient-reported quality-of-life outcomes in immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy: addressing gaps, capturing patient experience, and advancing the field.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Review
- Humanity-based nursing care in the ICU: a descriptive qualitative study.Philosophy, ethics, and humanities in medicine : PEHM · 2026Article
- Poor Glycemic Control in East Africa: Prevalence, Risk Factors and Public Health Implications in Diabetes Management.Endocrinology, diabetes & metabolism · 2026Review
- Physical Activity Prescription in Primary Health Care: An Ethical Analysis.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Caregivers' motivations for using pediatric Tuina for recurrent respiratory tract infections in young children in Southern China: a qualitative study.BMC complementary medicine and therapies · 2026Article
4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo identify and thematically analyse how healthcare professionals (HCPs) integrate patient values and preferences ('values integration') in primary care for adults with non-communicable diseases (NCDs).
designSystematic review and meta-aggregation methods were used for extraction, synthesis and analysis of qualitative evidence. DATA SOURCES: Relevant records were sourced using keywords to search 12 databases (ASSIA, CINAHL, DARE, EMBASE, ERIC, Google Scholar, GreyLit, Ovid-MEDLINE, PsycINFO, PubMed-MEDLINE, Scopus and Web of Science). ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Records needed to be published between 2000 and 2020 and report qualitative methods and findings in English involving HCP participants regarding primary care for adult patients. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Relevant data including participant quotations, authors' observations, interpretations and conclusions were extracted, synthesised and analysed in a phased approach using a modified version of the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Data Extraction Tool, as well as EPPI Reviewer and NVivo software. The JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for Qualitative Research was used to assess methodological quality of included records.
resultsThirty-one records involving >1032 HCP participants and 1823 HCP-patient encounters were reviewed. Findings included 143 approaches to values integration in clinical care, thematically analysed and synthesised into four themes: (1)
conclusionsHCPs incorporate patient values and preferences in healthcare through a variety of approaches including showing concern for the patient as a person, demonstrating competence at managing diseases, communicating with patients as partners and tailoring, adjusting and balancing overall care. Themes in this review provide a novel framework for understanding and addressing values integration in clinical care and provide useful insights for policymakers, educators and practitioners. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020166002.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.