Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36400460›Full record

ReviewClinics in liver disease2023

Evaluation of an Abnormal Liver Panel After Liver Transplantation.

Jacqueline B Henson, Andrew J Muir

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Clinics in liver disease, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jacqueline B HensonDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Duke University, DUMC Box 3913, Durham, NC 27710, USA. Electronic address: https://twitter.com/jackie_henson.
Andrew J MuirDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Duke University, DUMC Box 3913, Durham, NC 27710, USA; Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, DUMC Box 3913, Durham, NC 27710, USA. Electronic address: andrew.muir@duke.edu.

Funding

DUKE TRAINING GRANT IN DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND NUTRITIONT32DK007568 · NIDDK · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Katherine Garman, Rodger A. Liddle · 1988 to 2026
$5.6M
NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK007568
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Abnormal liver tests are common after liver transplantation. The differential diagnosis depends on the clinical context, particularly the time course, pattern and degree of elevation, and donor and recipient factors. The perioperative period has distinct causes compared with months and years after transplant, including ischemia-reperfusion injury, vascular thrombosis, and primary graft nonfunction. Etiologies seen beyond the perioperative period include biliary complications, rejection, infection, recurrent disease, and non-transplant-specific causes. The evaluation begins with a liver ultrasound with Doppler as well as appropriate laboratory testing and culminates in a liver biopsy if the imaging and laboratory testing is unrevealing.

Indexed as

Liver TransplantationHumansLiverLiver Function TestsPostoperative ComplicationsTissue DonorsBiliary complicationsHepatic artery thrombosisLiver testsLiver transplantationPrimary nonfunctionRecurrent disease

Identifiers

PMID36400460
PMCPMC10479649

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.