ReviewThe Lancet. Oncology2023
European Groundshot-addressing Europe's cancer research challenges: a Lancet Oncology Commission.
Review in The Lancet. Oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 43 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
43 citing papers in PubMed.
- The value of community engagement in the ESTRO-EORTC OligoCare project: A quantification of the in-kind contributions.Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2027Article
- Scientific Clinical Trial Publication Productivity in Medical Oncology: A Comparative Analysis and Data Review of Northern and Southern Italy.Clinics and practice · 2026Review
- The Societal Burden of Breast Cancer in Working-Age Women in Croatia: A Multicentre Cross-Sectional Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Changes in the 6th edition of the World Health Organization classification of tumours of the digestive system.Histopathology · 2026Review
- Health-related quality of life among working-age women with breast cancer in Croatia: a population-referenced cross-sectional study.BMC women's health · 2026Article
- Gender equity in radiology and radiology research: a survey by the European Society of Radiology.Insights into imaging · 2026Article
- Comparative evaluation of regression and machine-learning models for hepatocellular carcinoma risk stratification across diverse aetiologies.JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology · 2026Article
- Inequalities in availability of clinical trials for pediatric, adolescent, and young adult patients with cancer in Europe: results from the SIOPE OCEAN project.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2026Review
- Accelerating cancer treatment optimisation: A multistakeholder roadmap from the Cancer Medicines Forum.Journal of cancer policy · 2026Review
- Mapping the landscape of rural cancer research: a global bibliometric analysis.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2025Review
- The global, regional, and national burden of cancer, 1990-2023, with forecasts to 2050: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2023.Lancet (London, England) · 2025Article
- Where is clinical research in radiation oncology going? a snapshot from Lombardy, Italy-a study endorsed by AIRO Lombardia.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025Article
- Palliative radiotherapy in symptomatic pelvic soft tissue tumors (PallSoft)- protocol for a national, randomized, non-inferiority study.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- Describing the Core Attributes and Impact of Comprehensive Cancer Centers Internationally: A Chronological Scoping Review.Cancers · 2025Review
- Global, Regional, and National Burden of Male Breast Cancer, 1990-2021: A Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021.Cancer medicine · 2025Article
- Chronic pain after colorectal cancer treatment: A population-based cross-sectional study.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2025Article
- Exercise, cancer, and the cardiovascular system: clinical effects and mechanistic insights.Basic research in cardiology · 2025Review
- Global, regional, and national burden of laryngeal cancer in middle-aged and older adults from 1990 to 2021: an analysis of age and sex differences and attributable risk factors.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Implementing the Personalised Exercise Rehabilitation in Cancer Survivorship (PERCS) Triage and Referral System in Ireland: Protocol for a Qualitative Stakeholder Study.HRB open research · 2025Article
- Accelerating progress to reduce the cancer burden through prevention and control in the United States.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
47 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cancer research is a crucial pillar for countries to deliver more affordable, higher quality, and more equitable cancer care. Patients treated in research-active hospitals have better outcomes than patients who are not treated in these settings. However, cancer in Europe is at a crossroads. Cancer was already a leading cause of premature death before the COVID-19 pandemic, and the disastrous effects of the pandemic on early diagnosis and treatment will probably set back cancer outcomes in Europe by almost a decade. Recognising the pivotal importance of research not just to mitigate the pandemic today, but to build better European cancer services and systems for patients tomorrow, the Lancet Oncology European Groundshot Commission on cancer research brings together a wide range of experts, together with detailed new data on cancer research activity across Europe during the past 12 years. We have deployed this knowledge to help inform Europe's Beating Cancer Plan and the EU Cancer Mission, and to set out an evidence-driven, patient-centred cancer research roadmap for Europe. The high-resolution cancer research data we have generated show current activities, captured through different metrics, including by region, disease burden, research domain, and effect on outcomes. We have also included granular data on research collaboration, gender of researchers, and research funding. The inclusion of granular data has facilitated the identification of areas that are perhaps overemphasised in current cancer research in Europe, while also highlighting domains that are underserved. Our detailed data emphasise the need for more information-driven and data-driven cancer research strategies and planning going forward. A particular focus must be on central and eastern Europe, because our findings emphasise the widening gap in cancer research activity, and capacity and outcomes, compared with the rest of Europe. Citizens and patients, no matter where they are, must benefit from advances in cancer research. This Commission also highlights that the narrow focus on discovery science and biopharmaceutical research in Europe needs to be widened to include such areas as prevention and early diagnosis; treatment modalities such as radiotherapy and surgery; and a larger concentration on developing a research and innovation strategy for the 20 million Europeans living beyond a cancer diagnosis. Our data highlight the important role of comprehensive cancer centres in driving the European cancer research agenda. Crucial to a functioning cancer research strategy and its translation into patient benefit is the need for a greater emphasis on health policy and systems research, including implementation science, so that the innovative technological outputs from cancer research have a clear pathway to delivery. This European cancer research Commission has identified 12 key recommendations within a call to action to reimagine cancer research and its implementation in Europe. We hope this call to action will help to achieve our ambitious 70:35 target: 70% average 10-year survival for all European cancer patients by 2035.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36400101What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.