Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36400086›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet. Global health2022

Assessment of serological responses following vaccination campaigns with type 2 novel oral polio vaccine: a population-based study in Tajikistan in 2021.

Azamdzhon Mirzoev, Grace R Macklin, Yiting Zhang, Bernardo A Mainou, Umeda Sadykova, Victor Stefan Olsavszky, Shahin Huseynov, Murodali Ruziev, Faizali Saidzoda, Mahtob Bobokhonova and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet. Global health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Vaccine Derived Poliovirus (VDPV).Le infezioni in medicina · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Azamdzhon MirzoevInstitute of Postgraduate Education in Health, Dushanbe, Tajikistan.
Grace R MacklinPolio Eradication Department, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland. Electronic address: mackling@who.int.
Yiting ZhangDivision of Viral Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Bernardo A MainouDivision of Viral Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Umeda SadykovaWorld Health Organization, Country Office, Dushanbe, Tajikistan.
Victor Stefan OlsavszkyWorld Health Organization, Country Office, Dushanbe, Tajikistan.
Shahin HuseynovWorld Health Organization, Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Murodali RuzievInstitute of Preventive Medicine, Dushanbe, Tajikistan.
Faizali SaidzodaRepublican Center for Immuno-prophylaxis, Dushanbe, Tajikistan.
Mahtob BobokhonovaRepublican Center for Immuno-prophylaxis, Dushanbe, Tajikistan.
Ondrej MachPolio Eradication Department, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · USHabitat for Humanity · TJAcademy of Sciences of the Republic of Tajikistan · TJWorld Health Organization · CHWorld Health Organization Regional Office for Europe · DK

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNovel oral poliovirus vaccine type 2 (nOPV2) was used to control an outbreak of type 2 circulating vaccine derived poliovirus (cVDPV2) in Tajikistan, in 2021. We measured seroconversion and seroprevalence of type 2 polio antibodies in children who were reported to have received two doses of nOPV2 in outbreak response campaigns.

methodsIn this community serosurvey, children born after Jan 1, 2016 were enrolled from seven districts in Tajikistan. Dried blood spot cards were collected before nOPV2 campaigns and after the first and second rounds of the campaigns and were sent to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (Atlanta, GA, USA) for microneutralisation assay to determine presence of polio antibodies. The primary endpoint was to assess change in seroprevalence and seroconversion against poliovirus serotype 2 after one and two doses of nOPV2.

findings228 (97%) of 236 enrolled children were included in the analysis. The type 2 antibody seroprevalence was 26% (53/204; 95% CI 20 to 33) before nOPV2, 77% (161/210; 70 to 82) after one dose of nOPV2, and 83% (174/209; 77 to 88) after two doses of nOPV2. The increase in seroprevalence was statistically significant between baseline and after one nOPV2 dose (51 percentage points [42 to 59], p<0·0001), but not between the first and second doses (6 percentage points [-2 to 15], p=0·12). Seroconversion from the first nOPV2 dose, 67% (89/132; 59 to 75), was significantly greater than that from the second nOPV2 dose, 44% (20/45; 30 to 60; χ

interpretationOur study demonstrated strong immune responses following nOPV2 outbreak response campaigns in Tajikistan. Our results support previous clinical trial data on the generation of poliovirus type 2 immunity by nOPV2 and provide evidence that nOPV2 can be appropriate for the cVDPV2 outbreak response. The licensure and WHO prequalification of nOPV2 should be accelerated to facilitate wider use of the vaccine.

fundingWorld Health Organization, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and Rotary International.

Indexed as

PoliomyelitisPoliovirusAntibodies, ViralChildHumansImmunization ProgramsPoliovirus Vaccine, OralSeroepidemiologic StudiesTajikistanAntibodies, ViralPoliovirus Vaccine, Oral

Identifiers

PMID36400086
PMCPMC9681660
OpenAlexW4309107156

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.