Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36399609›Full record

ArticleHealth security

COVID-19 Pandemic Response Preparedness and Risk Perceptions Among Peruvian Veterinarians and Animal Care Workers.

Cusi Ferradas, Natalia Hernandez, Kathryn R Dalton, Meghan F Davis, Francesca Schiaffino

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health security. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Cusi FerradasCusi Ferradas, DVM, MPH, is a PhD Candidate, Department of Medicine and Epidemiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California Davis, Davis, CA.
Natalia HernandezNatalia Hernandez is a DVM Candidate, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru.
Kathryn R DaltonKathryn R. Dalton, VMD, MPH, PhD, was a Postdoctoral Fellow, Department of Environmental Health and Engineering, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD.
Meghan F DavisMeghan F. Davis, DVM, MPH, PhD, is an Associate Professor, Department of Environmental Health and Engineering, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, and Department of Molecular and Comparative Pathobiology, and Division of Infectious Diseases, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Francesca SchiaffinoFrancesca Schiaffino, DVM, MA, PhD, is a Research Assistant Professor, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru.
Johns Hopkins University · USUniversidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia · PEUniversity of California, Davis · US

Funding

University of California Launching Future Leaders in Global Health Research Training ProgramD43TW009343 · FIC · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI CRAIG R COHEN, Sung-Jae Lee · 2017 to 2026
$14.7M
FIC NIH HHS D43 TW009343
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peruvian veterinarians and animal care workers (VACW) are primary responders in the event of disasters or emergencies, yet they face unique concerns that could impede or block their essential functions in public health preparedness in comparison with VACWs in other countries. In this study, we used the Ready, Willing, and Able model via electronic survey to evaluate the perception of risks and barriers that Peruvian VACWs faced when deciding whether to continue working during the COVID-19 pandemic between July and December 2020. We used logistic regression models to evaluate associations between demographic characteristics, perceived role, and contact scores with 8 outcomes: knowledge of COVID-19; confidence in safety protocols; perceived threat; perceived job efficacy; perceived barriers; and readiness, willingness, and ability to respond to the COVID-19 pandemic. Less than 50% of respondents reported barriers to report to work during the pandemic. Respondents who reported higher contact with coworkers had an increased confidence in safety protocols (OR 5.16; 95% CI, 1.36 to 19.61) and willingness (OR 3.76; 95% CI, 1.14 to 12.47) to respond to the pandemic. Close contacts with essential workers and higher economic income were associated with higher reported knowledge of COVID-19. Respondents with higher perceived job efficacy had higher odds of reporting being ready, willing, and able to respond to COVID-19, while those who identified more barriers to report to work had lower odds of being ready, willing, and able to respond. The findings from this study, which showed differences from VACWs in the United States, can be used by individuals designing programs to improve pandemic and disaster preparedness in this essential, yet understudied and vulnerable, workforce.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsAnimalsAttitude of Health PersonnelHealth PersonnelHumansPublic HealthUnited StatesCOVID-19Disaster planningmodelPandemic preparedness“Ready Willing, and Able”SARS-CoV-2Veterinary and animal care occupation

Identifiers

PMID36399609
PMCPMC10162576
OpenAlexW4309327380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.