ArticleScience advances2022
Labor advantages drive the greater productivity of faculty at elite universities.
Article in Science advances, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparing the outputs of intramural and extramural grants funded by National Institutes of Health.eLife · 2026Article
- Analyzing global research trends in hepatology during Coronavirus Disease 2019: a bibliometric analysis.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025Review
- Tenure and research trajectories.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Regional disparities in US media coverage of archaeology research.Science advances · 2025Article
- The effect of trainee career intentions on mentor's interest in the trainee: Experimental evidence from academia.Research policy · 2025Article
- Collective predictive coding as model of science: formalizing scientific activities towards generative science.Royal Society open science · 2025Article
- Academic mentees thrive in big groups, but survive in small groups.Nature human behaviour · 2025Article
- Ethical and epistemic costs of a lack of geographical and cultural diversity in developmental science.Developmental psychology · 2025Article
- Patterns of diversity in biomedical coauthorships: An analysis across authors' ethnicity, gender, age, and expertise.PloS one · 2025Article
- Mid-career pitfall of consecutive success in science.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Underrepresented minority faculty in the USA face a double standard in promotion and tenure decisions.Nature human behaviour · 2024Article
- Scientific civility and academic performance.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Gender and retention patterns among U.S. faculty.Science advances · 2023Article
- Beyond market share: Accounting for doctoral program size in recent rates of anthropology faculty job placement.PloS one · 2023Article
- Article
- Untangling the network effects of productivity and prominence among scientists.Nature communications · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Faculty at prestigious institutions dominate scientific discourse, producing a disproportionate share of all research publications. Environmental prestige can drive such epistemic disparity, but the mechanisms by which it causes increased faculty productivity remain unknown. Here, we combine employment, publication, and federal survey data for 78,802 tenure-track faculty at 262 PhD-granting institutions in the American university system to show through multiple lines of evidence that the greater availability of funded graduate and postdoctoral labor at more prestigious institutions drives the environmental effect of prestige on productivity. In particular, greater environmental prestige leads to larger faculty-led research groups, which drive higher faculty productivity, primarily in disciplines with group collaboration norms. In contrast, productivity does not increase substantially with prestige for faculty publications without group members or for group members themselves. The disproportionate scientific productivity of elite researchers can be largely explained by their substantial labor advantage rather than inherent differences in talent.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.