Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36399554›Full record

ArticleScience advances2022

Snapping for high-speed and high-efficient butterfly stroke-like soft swimmer.

Yinding Chi, Yaoye Hong, Yao Zhao, Yanbin Li, Jie Yin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Bioinspired Morphology-Decoupled Soft Gripper with Enhanced Bidirectional Grasping Capability.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Robotic ray driven by periodic ring snapping.Innovation (Cambridge (Mass.)) · 2025
    Article
  11. Hyperelastic superomniphobic surfacesMaterials horizons · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Programmable seconds-to-days-long delayed snapping in jumping metashells.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  14. Rotation-Based Snap-Fit Mechanical Metamaterials.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. A rapid-response soft end effector inspired by the hummingbird beak.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yinding ChiDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2674-721X
Yaoye HongDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA.
Yao ZhaoDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA.
Yanbin LiDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0870-4507
Jie YinDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6297-1262

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Natural selection has tuned many flying and swimming animals to share the same narrow design space for high power efficiency, e.g., their dimensionless Strouhal numbers St that relate flapping frequency and amplitude and forward speed fall within the range of 0.2 < St < 0.4 for peak propulsive efficiency. It is rather challenging to achieve both comparably fast-speed and high-efficient soft swimmers to marine animals due to the naturally selected narrow design space and soft body compliance. Here, bioinspired by the flapping motion in swimming animals, we report leveraging snapping instabilities for soft flapping-wing swimmers with comparable high performance to biological counterparts. The lightweight, butterfly stroke-like soft swimmer (2.8 g) demonstrates a record-high speed of 3.74 body length/s (4.8 times faster than the reported fastest flapping soft swimmer), high power efficiency (0.2 < St = 0.25 < 0.4), low energy consumption cost, and high maneuverability (a high turning speed of 157°/s).

Identifiers

PMID36399554
PMCPMC9674291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.