Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36399236›Full record

ReviewCurrent psychiatry reports2022

Machine Learning and Non-Affective Psychosis: Identification, Differential Diagnosis, and Treatment.

Maria Ferrara, Giorgia Franchini, Melissa Funaro, Marcello Cutroni, Beatrice Valier, Tommaso Toffanin, Laura Palagini, Luigi Zerbinati, Federica Folesani, Martino Belvederi Murri and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current psychiatry reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Maria FerraraDepartment of Neuroscience and Rehabilitation, Institute of Psychiatry, University of Ferrara, via Fossato di Mortara 64/A, Ferrara, Italy. maria.ferrara@unife.it.
Giorgia FranchiniDepartment of Physics, Informatics and Mathematics, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Via Campi 213/B, Modena, Italy.
Melissa FunaroHarvey Cushing/John Hay Whitney Medical Library, Yale University, 333 Cedar St., New Haven, CT, USA.
Marcello CutroniDepartment of Neuroscience and Rehabilitation, Institute of Psychiatry, University of Ferrara, via Fossato di Mortara 64/A, Ferrara, Italy.
Beatrice ValierDepartment of Neuroscience and Rehabilitation, Institute of Psychiatry, University of Ferrara, via Fossato di Mortara 64/A, Ferrara, Italy.
Tommaso ToffaninDepartment of Neuroscience and Rehabilitation, Institute of Psychiatry, University of Ferrara, via Fossato di Mortara 64/A, Ferrara, Italy.
Laura PalaginiDepartment of Neuroscience and Rehabilitation, Institute of Psychiatry, University of Ferrara, via Fossato di Mortara 64/A, Ferrara, Italy.
Luigi ZerbinatiDepartment of Neuroscience and Rehabilitation, Institute of Psychiatry, University of Ferrara, via Fossato di Mortara 64/A, Ferrara, Italy.
Federica FolesaniDepartment of Neuroscience and Rehabilitation, Institute of Psychiatry, University of Ferrara, via Fossato di Mortara 64/A, Ferrara, Italy.
Martino Belvederi MurriDepartment of Neuroscience and Rehabilitation, Institute of Psychiatry, University of Ferrara, via Fossato di Mortara 64/A, Ferrara, Italy.
Rosangela CarusoDepartment of Neuroscience and Rehabilitation, Institute of Psychiatry, University of Ferrara, via Fossato di Mortara 64/A, Ferrara, Italy.
Luigi GrassiDepartment of Neuroscience and Rehabilitation, Institute of Psychiatry, University of Ferrara, via Fossato di Mortara 64/A, Ferrara, Italy.

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThis review will cover the most relevant findings on the use of machine learning (ML) techniques in the field of non-affective psychosis, by summarizing the studies published in the last three years focusing on illness detection and treatment. RECENT

findingsMultiple ML tools that include mostly supervised approaches such as support vector machine, gradient boosting, and random forest showed promising results by applying these algorithms to various sources of data: socio-demographic information, EEG, language, digital content, blood biomarkers, neuroimaging, and electronic health records. However, the overall performance, in the binary classification case, varied from 0.49, which is to be considered very low (i.e., noise), to over 0.90. These results are fully justified by different factors, some of which may be attributable to the preprocessing of the data, the wide variety of the data, and the a-priori setting of hyperparameters. One of the main limitations of the field is the lack of stratification of results based on biological sex, given that psychosis presents differently in men and women; hence, the necessity to tailor identification tools and data analytic strategies. Timely identification and appropriate treatment are key factors in reducing the consequences of psychotic disorders. In recent years, the emergence of new analytical tools based on artificial intelligence such as supervised ML approaches showed promises as a potential breakthrough in this field. However, ML applications in everyday practice are still in its infancy.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligencePsychotic DisordersAlgorithmsDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansMachine LearningMaleClinical high riskDigital phenotypingMachine learningPsychotic disordersSchizophrenia

Identifiers

PMID36399236
PMCPMC9780131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.