ArticleMycopathologia2023
The In Vitro Activity of Fluconazole, Amphotericin B and Echinocandins Against Cyberlindnera fabianii Planktonic Cells and Biofilms.
Article in Mycopathologia, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Fungemia caused byMedical mycology case reports · 2026Article
- Echinocandins have an alternative mode of action on biomimetic membranes that is not directly related to the functioning of (1,3) beta-glucan synthase.Cell death discovery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Until recently, little was known about the susceptibility pattern of Cyberlindnera fabianii (Cy. fabianii) planktonic cells and biofilms regarding the most frequently administered systemic antifungals, despite the high mortality rate and its potential role in catheter-related infections. In the current study, the activity of fluconazole, amphotericin B and echinocandins (anidulafungin, caspofungin and micafungin) was determined against planktonic and sessile cells of Cy. fabianii clinical isolates (n = 8). Planktonic minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) ranged from 1 to 2, from 0.25 to 1, from 0.015 to 0.06, from 0.03 to 0.12 and from 0.25 to 0.5 mg/l for fluconazole, amphotericin B, anidulafungin, caspofungin and micafungin, respectively. One-day-old biofilms were highly resistant to fluconazole (MIC ranged from 512 to > 512) compared to planktonic counterparts, but not to amphotericin B (MIC ranged from 0.25 to 2 mg/l) and echinocandins (MIC ranged from 0.06 to 2 mg/l). Based on the calculated planktonic killing rates, the highest activity was observed in the case of anidulafungin (k values ranged from 0.37 to 2.09), while micafungin, caspofungin, amphotericin B and fluconazole exerted 0.46-1.47, 0.14-0.86, -0.03 to 2.08 and -0.15 to 0.09 killing rate value ranges, respectively. The obtained in vitro planktonic and sessile susceptibility patterns suggest that echinocandins and amphotericin B may be the most reliable treatment option for the treatment of Cy. fabianii infections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.