Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36399190›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of applied physiology2023

Physiological effects of microcurrent and its application for maximising acute responses and chronic adaptations to exercise.

Stefan Kolimechkov, Marcos Seijo, Ian Swaine, Jack Thirkell, Juan C Colado, Fernando Naclerio

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of applied physiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Stefan KolimechkovCentre for Exercise Activity and Rehabilitation, Institute for Lifecourse Development, School of Human Sciences, University of Greenwich, London, UK.
Marcos SeijoCentre for Exercise Activity and Rehabilitation, Institute for Lifecourse Development, School of Human Sciences, University of Greenwich, London, UK.
Ian SwaineCentre for Exercise Activity and Rehabilitation, Institute for Lifecourse Development, School of Human Sciences, University of Greenwich, London, UK.
Jack ThirkellDepartment of Biological Sciences, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Royal Holloway University of London, London, UK.
Juan C ColadoResearch Group in Prevention and Health in Exercise and Sport, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Fernando NaclerioCentre for Exercise Activity and Rehabilitation, Institute for Lifecourse Development, School of Human Sciences, University of Greenwich, London, UK. f.j.naclerio@greenwich.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7405-4894
University of Greenwich · GBRoyal Holloway University of London · GBUniversitat de València · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microcurrent is a non-invasive and safe electrotherapy applied through a series of sub-sensory electrical currents (less than 1 mA), which are of a similar magnitude to the currents generated endogenously by the human body. This review focuses on examining the physiological mechanisms mediating the effects of microcurrent when combined with different exercise modalities (e.g. endurance and strength) in healthy physically active individuals. The reviewed literature suggests the following candidate mechanisms could be involved in enhancing the effects of exercise when combined with microcurrent: (i) increased adenosine triphosphate resynthesis, (ii) maintenance of intercellular calcium homeostasis that in turn optimises exercise-induced structural and morphological adaptations, (iii) eliciting a hormone-like effect, which increases catecholamine secretion that in turn enhances exercise-induced lipolysis and (iv) enhanced muscle protein synthesis. In healthy individuals, despite a lack of standardisation on how microcurrent is combined with exercise (e.g. whether the microcurrent is pulsed or continuous), there is evidence concerning its effects in promoting body fat reduction, skeletal muscle remodelling and growth as well as attenuating delayed-onset muscle soreness. The greatest hindrance to understanding the combined effects of microcurrent and exercise is the variability of the implemented protocols, which adds further challenges to identifying the mechanisms, optimal patterns of current(s) and methodology of application. Future studies should standardise microcurrent protocols by accurately describing the used current [e.g. intensity (μA), frequency (Hz), application time (minutes) and treatment duration (e.g. weeks)] for specific exercise outcomes, e.g. strength and power, endurance, and gaining muscle mass or reducing body fat.

Indexed as

Electric Stimulation TherapyMuscle, SkeletalAcclimatizationAdaptation, PhysiologicalExerciseHumansBody compositionDelayed-onset muscle sorenessLipolysisMicrocurrent electrical nerve stimulationMuscle thicknessNon-invasive electrical micro-ampere stimulusSubsensory

Identifiers

PMID36399190
PMCPMC9941239
OpenAlexW4309364914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.