Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36398937›Full record

ArticleJournal of primary care & community health

Perceived Barriers and Facilitators of Implementing a Multicomponent Intervention to Improve Communication With Older Adults With and Without Dementia (SHARING Choices) in Primary Care: A Qualitative Study.

Kelly M Smith, Danny Scerpella, Amy Guo, Naaz Hussain, Jessica L Colburn, Valerie T Cotter, Jennifer Aufill, Sydney M Dy, Jennifer L Wolff

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of primary care & community health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04819191 (Improving Communication for Primary Care Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04819191 nacompletednot on this map

Improving Communication for Primary Care Patients (SHARING Choices)

TypeinterventionalSponsorJohns Hopkins UniversityRan2021 to 2023Enrolled64,915ConditionsAdvance Care Planning, DementiaArmsSHARING Choices
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Implementation science in care for older adults across healthcare settings: a scoping review.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kelly M SmithMichael Garron Hospital - Toronto East Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9483-5118
Danny ScerpellaJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Amy GuoJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Naaz HussainJohns Hopkins Medicine, Frederick, MD, USA.
Jessica L ColburnJohns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Valerie T CotterJohns Hopkins School of Nursing, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Jennifer AufillJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Sydney M DyJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Jennifer L WolffJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Funding

PRAGMATIC TRIAL TO IMPROVE COMMUNICATION FOR PRIMARY CARE PATIENTS WITH ADRDR33AG061882 · NIA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI DY, SYDNEY MORSS, WOLFF, JENNIFER L. · 2020 to 2022
$3.8M
Pragmatic Trial to Improve Communication for Primary Care Patients with ADRDR61AG061882 · NIA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI DY, SYDNEY MORSS, WOLFF, JENNIFER L. · 2018 to 2019
$818k
NIA NIH HHS R33 AG061882NIA NIH HHS R61 AG061882
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionImplementing patient- and family-centered communication strategies has proven challenging in primary care, particularly for persons with dementia. To address this, we designed SHARING Choices, a multicomponent intervention combining patient and family partnered agenda setting, electronic portal access, and supports for advance care planning (ACP). This qualitative descriptive study describes factors affecting SHARING Choices implementation within primary care.

methodsSemi-structured interviews or focus groups with patient/family dyads (family, friends, unpaid caregivers) and primary care stakeholders (clinicians, staff, administrators) elicited perceived barriers and facilitators of SHARING Choices implementation. Field notes and interview transcripts were coded using template analysis along the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) constructs. Content analysis identified themes not readily categorized within CFIR.

resultsAbout 22 dyads, including 14 with cognitive impairment, and 30 stakeholders participated in the study. Participants were receptive to the SHARING Choices components. Enablers of SHARING Choices included adaptability of the intervention, purposive engagement of family (particularly for patients with dementia), consistency with organizational priorities, and the relative advantage of SHARING Choices compared to current practices. Perceived barriers to implementation included intervention complexity, space constraints, workflow, and ACP hesitancy. The ACP facilitator was perceived as supportive in addressing individual and organizational implementation barriers including patient health and technology literacy and clinician time for ACP discussions.

conclusionsPatients, family, and primary care clinicians endorsed the objectives and individual components of SHARING Choices. Strategies to enhance adoption were to simplify materials, streamline processes, leverage existing workflows, and embed ACP facilitators within the primary care team.

Indexed as

Advance Care PlanningDementiaAgedCommunicationHumansPrimary Health CareQualitative Researchdementiaend of lifegeriatricspatient-centerednesspractice managementprimary carequalitative methods

Identifiers

PMID36398937
PMCPMC9677296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.