ArticleOrthopaedic surgery2023
"Inside Disc Out" Discectomy for the Treatment of Discogenic Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis under the Intervertebral Foramen Endoscope.
Article in Orthopaedic surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Single-Cell Microgel Encapsulation Improves the Therapeutic Efficacy of Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Treating Intervertebral Disc Degeneration via Inhibiting Pyroptosis.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveConventional posterior-approach decompression surgeries have a higher risk of nerve root injury and dura laceration. We explore the therapeutic strategy and effect of "inside disc out" discectomy under intervertebral foramen endoscope technique for discogenic lumbar spinal canal stenosis (DLSS) treatment.
methodsTwenty-nine patients with DLSS in the responsible segment were treated with "inside disc out" discectomy under intervertebral foramen endoscope technique between October 2017 to October 2019. Lower limb and back pain were recorded before operation, and visual analogue scale (VAS) score and Oswestry disability index (ODI) were recorded for lower limb and back pain at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. The postoperative effects were evaluated using the modified MacNab method for all the patients.
resultsAll 29 patients successfully completed the operation. The operation time was 75-120 min, with an average of 90 ± 17 min. Postoperative lumbar CT examinations of all the patients showed full decompression of the spinal cord with no residual pressure. The average follow-up time for all the patients was 13 ± 3.5 months (12-18 months). The VAS score for lower back and lower limb pain was 7.52 ± 1.25 before the operation, and 1.80 ± 0.63, 1.33 ± 0.88, 1.07 ± 0.89, and 0.81 ± 0.51 at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after the surgery, respectively. The Oswestry dysfunction index was 59.43 ± 10.04 before surgery and 29.67 ± 10.35, 21.13 ± 9.32, 14.52 ± 5.98, and 9.84 ± 4.68 at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after the surgery, respectively. The VAS score and ODI index of low back and lower limb pain at different time points after the surgery were significantly improved compared to those before the surgery (P < 0.01). The effect of the modified MacNab was excellent in 26 patients, good in two patients, and fair in one patient. The excellent and good rates were 91.4%. Among them, one patient had symptoms of hyperesthesia in the anterior aspect of the thigh and decreased quadriceps muscle strength after lumbar 4/5 segment endoscopic surgery. After symptomatic and conservative treatment, the symptoms disappeared 4 weeks postoperatively, and there were no other serious surgical complications.
conclusionsFollowing the "inside disc out" discectomy under intervertebral foramen endoscope protocols, the risk of nerve injury can greatly be reduced, with good postoperative efficacy. Overall, the procedure is safe and feasible for DLSS treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.