ArticleExperimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.)2022
Topology and redescriptions detect multiple alternative biological pathways from clinical phenotypes.
Article in Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Remics: a redescription-based framework for multi-omics analysis.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Article
- Probing omics data via harmonic persistent homology.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Applied artificial intelligence in healthcare: Listening to the winds of change in a post-COVID-19 world.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Biological pathways play a crucial role in the properties of diseases and are important in drug discovery. Identifying the logical relationships among distinctive phenotypic clusters could reveal possible connections to the underlying pathways. However, this process is challenging since clinical phenotypes are often available through unstructured electronic health records. Moreover, in the absence of a standardized questionnaire, there could be bias among physicians toward selecting certain medical terms. In this article, we develop an efficient pipeline to address these challenges and help practitioners to reveal the pathways associated with the disease. We use topological data analysis and redescriptions and propose a pipeline of four phases: (1) pre-processing the clinical notes to extract the salient concepts, (2) constructing a feature space of the patients to characterize the extracted concepts, (3) leveraging the topological properties to distill the available knowledge and visualize the extracted features, and finally, (4) investigating the bias in the clinical notes of the selected features and identify possible pathways. Our experiments on a publicly available dataset of COVID-19 clinical notes testify that our pipeline can indeed extract meaningful pathways.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.