ArticleEpilepsia2023
Machine learning for the early prediction of infants with electrographic seizures in neonatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy.
Article in Epilepsia, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02431780 (A Multi-centre, Randomised, Controlled, Clinical Investigation of a Standalone Decision Support Algorithm for Neonatal Seizure Recognition), which is not on this map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Multi-centre, Randomised, Controlled, Clinical Investigation of a Standalone Decision Support Algorithm for Neonatal Seizure Recognition
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.
- Accuracy of Machine Learning in Detecting Pediatric Epileptic Seizures: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Pooled it
- From promise to practice: digital health through the lens of neonatal care.Lancet regional health. Americas · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Pediatric Epilepsy: A Systematic Review.Neurology and therapy · 2026Review
- Scalp high-frequency activity differentiates neonates with seizures from healthy neonates and indicates postneonatal epilepsy risk.Epilepsia · 2026Article
- AES ILAE North America Symposium: Guiding Evidence-Based Epilepsy Management.Epilepsy currents · 2026Article
- Combined model of radiomics and clinical features for predicting prognosis of term neonatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy after one year: an exploratory study.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
- The impact of sleep in high-risk infants.Pediatric research · 2025Review
- Emerging modalities for neuroprognostication in neonatal encephalopathy: harnessing the potential of artificial intelligence.Pediatric research · 2025Review
- Short-horizon neonatal seizure prediction using EEG-based deep learning.PLOS digital health · 2025Article
- Current progress and future prospects of machine learning in the diagnosis of neonatal encephalopathy: a narrative review.Translational pediatrics · 2025Review
- Review of Precision Medicine and Diagnosis of Neonatal Illness.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Detection of Sub-acute Brain Injury and Hypoxic-ischemic Encephalopathy using I2C2-WGO and CO-GW-RNN.Current medical imaging · 2025Article
- Machine learning for forecasting initial seizure onset in neonatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy.Epilepsia · 2025Article
- Is there a problem with how we select patients for therapeutic hypothermia?Pediatric research · 2024Article
- Quantitative EEG and prediction of outcome in neonatal encephalopathy: a review.Pediatric research · 2024Review
- Deep Learning for Generalized EEG Seizure Detection after Hypoxia-Ischemia-Preclinical Validation.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Transforming neonatal care with artificial intelligence: challenges, ethical consideration, and opportunities.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2024Review
- Article
- Quantitative EEG in the neonatal intensive care unit: Current application and future promise.Annals of the Child Neurology Society · 2023Review
- Evaluation of the Hypotensive Preterm Infant: Evidence-Based Practice at the Bedside?Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo assess if early clinical and electroencephalography (EEG) features predict later seizure development in infants with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE).
methodsClinical and EEG parameters <12 h of birth from infants with HIE across eight European Neonatal Units were used to develop seizure-prediction models. Clinical parameters included intrapartum complications, fetal distress, gestational age, delivery mode, gender, birth weight, Apgar scores, assisted ventilation, cord pH, and blood gases. The earliest EEG hour provided a qualitative analysis (discontinuity, amplitude, asymmetry/asynchrony, sleep-wake cycle [SWC]) and a quantitative analysis (power, discontinuity, spectral distribution, inter-hemispheric connectivity) from full montage and two-channel amplitude-integrated EEG (aEEG). Subgroup analysis, only including infants without anti-seizure medication (ASM) prior to EEG was also performed. Machine-learning (ML) models (random forest and gradient boosting algorithms) were developed to predict infants who would later develop seizures and assessed using Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) and area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC).
resultsThe study included 162 infants with HIE (53 had seizures). Low Apgar, need for ventilation, high lactate, low base excess, absent SWC, low EEG power, and increased EEG discontinuity were associated with seizures. The following predictive models were developed: clinical (MCC 0.368, AUC 0.681), qualitative EEG (MCC 0.467, AUC 0.729), quantitative EEG (MCC 0.473, AUC 0.730), clinical and qualitative EEG (MCC 0.470, AUC 0.721), and clinical and quantitative EEG (MCC 0.513, AUC 0.746). The clinical and qualitative-EEG model significantly outperformed the clinical model alone (MCC 0.470 vs 0.368, p-value .037). The clinical and quantitative-EEG model significantly outperformed the clinical model (MCC 0.513 vs 0.368, p-value .012). The clinical and quantitative-EEG model for infants without ASM (n = 131) had MCC 0.588, AUC 0.832. Performance for quantitative aEEG (n = 159) was MCC 0.381, AUC 0.696 and clinical and quantitative aEEG was MCC 0.384, AUC 0.720. SIGNIFICANCE: Early EEG background analysis combined with readily available clinical data helped predict infants who were at highest risk of seizures, hours before they occur. Automated quantitative-EEG analysis was as good as expert analysis for predicting seizures, supporting the use of automated assessment tools for early evaluation of HIE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.