Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36398283›Full record

ArticleJournal of agricultural, biological, and environmental statistics2021

A Statistical Perspective on the Challenges in Molecular Microbial Biology.

Pratheepa Jeganathan, Susan P Holmes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of agricultural, biological, and environmental statistics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Pratheepa JeganathanDepartment of Statistics, Stanford University, Sequoia Hall, 390 Jane Stanford Way, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Susan P HolmesDepartment of Statistics, Stanford University, Sequoia Hall, 390 Jane Stanford Way, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2208-8168

Funding

Predicting Resilience in the Human MicrobiomeR01AI112401 · NIAID · PALO ALTO VETERANS INSTIT FOR RESEARCH · PI HOLMES, SUSAN P, RELMAN, DAVID A. · 2013 to 2017
$6.2M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI112401
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High throughput sequencing (HTS)-based technology enables identifying and quantifying non-culturable microbial organisms in all environments. Microbial sequences have enhanced our understanding of the human microbiome, the soil and plant environment, and the marine environment. All molecular microbial data pose statistical challenges due to contamination sequences from reagents, batch effects, unequal sampling, and undetected taxa. Technical biases and heteroscedasticity have the strongest effects, but different strains across subjects and environments also make direct differential abundance testing unwieldy. We provide an introduction to a few statistical tools that can overcome some of these difficulties and demonstrate those tools on an example. We show how standard statistical methods, such as simple hierarchical mixture and topic models, can facilitate inferences on latent microbial communities. We also review some nonparametric Bayesian approaches that combine visualization and uncertainty quantification. The intersection of molecular microbial biology and statistics is an exciting new venue. Finally, we list some of the important open problems that would benefit from more careful statistical method development.

Indexed as

Bayesian data analysisBayesian nonparametric ordinationHierarchical mixture modelsLatent Dirichlet allocationMicrobial ecologyQuality controlSequencing data

Identifiers

PMID36398283
PMCPMC9667415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.