Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36398277›Full record

SynthesisF1000Research2021

SARS-CoV-2 and the role of close contact in transmission: a systematic review.

Igho J Onakpoya, Carl J Heneghan, Elizabeth A Spencer, Jon Brassey, Annette Plüddemann, David H Evans, John M Conly, Tom Jefferson

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in F1000Research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Transmission of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) from pre and asymptomatic infected individuals: a systematic review.Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases · 2022
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Igho J OnakpoyaNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2420-0811
Carl J HeneghanNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1009-1992
Elizabeth A SpencerNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9079-8006
Jon BrasseyTrip Database Ltd, Newport, NP20 3PS, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7812-6311
Annette PlüddemannNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK.
David H EvansDepartment of Medical Microbiology & Immunology,Li Ka Shing Institute of Virology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2R3, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5871-299X
John M ConlyUniversity of Calgary and Alberta Health Services,, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, T2N 4Z6, Canada.
Tom JeffersonNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Close contactCOVID-19systematic reviewtransmission

Identifiers

PMID36398277
PMCPMC9636487.3

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.