ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2022
Effect of vacuum sealing drainage plus skin grafting on deep burns and analysis of risk factors for postoperative infection.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and safety of vacuum sealing drainage combined with skin grafting for the treatment of limb burns.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2025Article
- Role of macrophage polarisation in skin wound healing.International wound journal · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo analyze the effect of vacuum sealing drainage (VSD) plus skin grafting on deep burns and the risk factors of postoperative infection.
methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on 124 patients with deep burns who were admitted to the Taizhou People's Hospital from February 2019 to February 2021. The 55 patients who underwent traditional dressing change therapy plus second-stage skin grafting became the control group. The remaining 69 patients treated with first stage VSD plus second-stage skin grafting became the observation group. Wound healing time, hospital stay, postoperative infection, wound closure success rate, pain degree, and scar hyperplasia were recorded and compared between the two groups. Logistic regression was used to analyze the risk factors of postoperative infection in patients.
resultsCompared with the control group, the observation group had a shorter time of wound healing and hospital stay, lower postoperative wound infection rate and lung infection rate, higher success rate of wound closure, lower pain degree scores on the 7th day after the operation, and less scar hyperplasia (all P<0.05). Logistic regression analysis revealed that burn degree, treatment plan, proportion of burn area, and wound healing time were the factors affecting postoperative infection in patients.
conclusionVSD plus skin grafting have significant effects on deep burns. This combined treatment reduced the occurrence of the wound infection, relieved pain, shortened the healing time and hospitalization time, and reduced the proliferation of scars in the later stage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36398255PMC9641438W4309411185What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.