ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2022
The impact of unified discharge standards on the clinical efficacy and prognosis of hemiarthroplasty in elderly patients with hip fractures.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe aim of this study was to investigate the impact of unified discharge standards on the clinical efficacy and prognosis of hemiarthroplasty in elderly patients with hip fractures.
methodsRetrospective study of 158 elderly patients with hip fractures who underwent artificial femoral head replacement in our hospital from March 2016 to July 2019 were enrolled. According to the unified discharge standards, patients were divided into the observation (65 cases who met discharge criteria) and control group (93 cases who failed to meet all discharge criteria). Histopathological feature, operation status, postoperative Harris Hip score, therapeutic outcome, postoperative complications, readmission and mortality rate were compared between the two groups.
resultsSurgery duration and intraoperative blood loss exhibited no difference between the two groups, while transfusion volume and length of hospital stay were significantly increased in the observation group. There was no significant difference in the Harris Hip score between the two groups 12 months postoperatively. The incidence of postoperative complications during the follow-up period was notably lower in the observation group. In addition, the three-month readmission rate and one-year mortality rate were significantly lower in the observation group.
conclusionsFor elderly patients with hip fractures undergoing artificial femoral head replacement, the incidence of postoperative complications and postoperative readmission/mortality rate could be reduced through the establishment of unified discharge standards, which should be used in future clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36398228PMC9641473W4309408889What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.