ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2022
Characteristics and negative impacts of pleural effusion in hospitalized patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHospitalized patients on maintenance hemodialysis often develop pleural effusion (PE). The prognosis of these patients is likely to be affected by the PE. This study examined the characteristics of PE, identified risk factors for its development, and explored its negative effects.
methodsIn this retrospective study, we analyzed medical records of 1,077 patients who underwent maintenance hemodialysis between October 2014 and January 2022. According to the chest computed tomography (CT) imaging results, patients were categorized into two groups: PE and non-PE. A definitive diagnosis of PE was made after a nephrologist, a pulmonary physician, and a radiologist reviewed the case.
resultsOf the 1,077 patients, 343 (31.85%) were diagnosed with PE. These patients had a mean age of 55.28±15.21 years old and 61.47% of them were men. There were 77.84% patients with PE resulting from heart failure, and 82.02% of these patients had bilateral effusions. The occurrence of PE was associated with cardiovascular disease, clinic-systolic blood pressure (SBP), chest tightness, leg edema, and pro-brain natriuretic peptide (pro-BNP). PE patients had a poorer survival rate than patients without PE (unadjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 4.17; 95% CI: 3.12-5.57). The survival rates of patients with small PE did not differ from those with moderate to large PE. Similarly, no difference was found in survival between the bilateral PE and unilateral PE groups, as well as between the heart failure and non-heart failure groups.
conclusionsHospitalized patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis have a high incidence of PE. PE (even a small amount) is an risk factor for increased mortality. These poor prognostic features should be noted by physicians and managed accordingly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36398221PMC9641457W4309412697What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.