ArticleAmerican journal of translational research2022
Effect of comprehensive nursing intervention in children with respiratory failure.
Article in American journal of translational research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate the effect of comprehensive nursing intervention in the management of pediatric patients with respiratory failure.
methodsA total of 60 pediatric patients were selected as research subjects, and the clinical data were collected and retrospectively investigated. The patients were divided either into a control group (n=30) or an observation group (n=30) according to the nursing care methods. Pediatric patients from the observation group underwent comprehensive nursing intervention, while those in the control group received conventional nursing care intervention. The clinical effects, negative emotions, SF-36 scores, hospital stays, clinical symptom indicators, blood gas indices, lung function indicators and the nursing satisfaction rates were compared between the two groups.
resultsThe clinical effect in the observation group was significantly better than that in the control group. Compared with those in the control group, significantly lower scores of the Self-Rating Anxiety Scale and the Self-Rating Depression Scale were observed in the observation group. The indicators associated with blood gas and lung function in the observation group were significantly improved in contrast to those in the control group. Moreover, the disappearance time of pulmonary rales, disappearance time of cyanochroia, alleviation time of dyspnea and hospital stays in the observation group were significantly shorter than those in the control group, while the SF-36 scores and the nursing satisfaction rate in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group (all P<0.05).
conclusionComprehensive nursing intervention significantly improved clinical treatment effects and patient satisfaction, alleviated the clinical symptoms, increased life quality and shortened hospital stay. So, it is worth being promoted in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36398203PMC9641464W4309413720What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.