Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36398134›Full record

ArticleHemaSphere2022

Acalabrutinib Versus Investigator's Choice in Relapsed/Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: Final ASCEND Trial Results.

Paolo Ghia, Andrzej Pluta, Małgorzata Wach, Daniel Lysak, Martin Šimkovič, Iryna Kriachok, Árpád Illés, Javier de la Serna, Sean Dolan, Philip Campbell and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in HemaSphere, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 58 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
13.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 99 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Review
  12. Observational
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 16 institutions in 11 countries.

Paolo GhiaUniversità Vita-Salute San Raffaele and IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milano, Italy.
Andrzej PlutaDepartment of Hematological Oncology, Oncology Specialist Hospital, Brzozow, Poland.
Małgorzata WachDepartment of Hemato-Oncology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, Medical University of Lublin, Poland.
Daniel LysakFakultní Nemocnice Plzen, Pilsen, Czech Republic.
Martin ŠimkovičUniversity Hospital Hradec Kralove, Charles University, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic.
Iryna KriachokNational Cancer Institute, Kyiv, Ukraine.
Árpád IllésDivision of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Hungary.
Javier de la SernaHospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
Sean DolanSaint John Regional Hospital, University of New Brunswick, Canada.
Philip CampbellBarwon Health, University Hospital Geelong, VIC, Australia.
Gerardo MusuracaIstituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori, Meldola, Italy.
Abraham JacobThe Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, United Kingdom.
Eric J AveryNebraska Hematology Oncology, Lincoln, NE, USA.
Jae Hoon LeeGachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Republic of Korea (South).
Ganna UsenkoCity Clinical Hospital No. 4 DCC, Dnipro, Ukraine.
Min Hui WangAstraZeneca, South San Francisco, CA, USA.
Ting YuAstraZeneca, South San Francisco, CA, USA.
Wojciech JurczakMaria Sklodowska-Curie National Institute of Oncology, Krakow, Poland.
AstraZeneca (United States) · USBarwon Health · AUCharles University · CZGachon University Gil Medical Center · KRHospital Universitario 12 De Octubre · ESIRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele · ITIstituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori · ITMedical University of Lublin · PLNational Cancer Institute · UANebraska Hematology-Oncology · USRegional Clinical Hospital named after II Mechnikov · UASaint John Regional Hospital · CAThe Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology · PLThe Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust · GBUniversity Hospital Plzen · CZUniversity of Debrecen · HU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acalabrutinib is a Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). ASCEND is the pivotal phase 3 study of acalabrutinib versus investigator's choice of idelalisib plus rituximab (IdR) or bendamustine plus rituximab (BR) in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) CLL. In the primary ASCEND analysis (median 16.1-month follow-up), acalabrutinib showed superior efficacy with an acceptable tolerability profile versus IdR/BR; here, we report final ~4 year follow-up results. Patients with R/R CLL received oral acalabrutinib 100 mg twice daily until progression or unacceptable toxicity, or investigator's choice of IdR or BR. A total of 310 patients (acalabrutinib, n = 155; IdR, n = 119; BR, n = 36) were enrolled. At median follow-up of 46.5 months (acalabrutinib) and 45.3 months (IdR/BR), acalabrutinib significantly prolonged investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) versus IdR/BR (median, not reached [NR] vs 16.8 months;

Identifiers

PMID36398134
PMCPMC9666115
OpenAlexW4308963956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.