Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36398063›Full record

ArticleClinical psychology in Europe2020

Post-Event Processing After Embarrassing Situations: Comparing Experience Sampling Data of Depressed and Socially Anxious Individuals.

Jasmin Čolić, Anna Latysheva, Tyler R Bassett, Christian Imboden, Klaus Bader, Martin Hatzinger, Thorsten Mikoteit, Andrea Hans Meyer, Roselind Lieb, Andrew T Gloster and 1 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical psychology in Europe, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Clinical and Psychosocial Predictors of Post-Event Processing in Adults Who Stutter.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jasmin ČolićInstitute of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8504-9898
Anna LatyshevaInstitute of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Tyler R BassettInstitute of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Christian ImbodenPrivate Clinic Wyss, Muenchenbuchsee, Switzerland.
Klaus BaderCentre for Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, Psychiatric Hospital, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Martin HatzingerPsychiatric Services Solothurn, Solothurn, Switzerland.
Thorsten MikoteitPsychiatric Services Solothurn, Solothurn, Switzerland.
Andrea Hans MeyerDivision of Clinical Psychology and Epidemiology, Department of Psychology, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Roselind LiebDivision of Clinical Psychology and Epidemiology, Department of Psychology, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Andrew T Gloster *Division of Clinical Psychology and Intervention Science, Department of Psychology, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Jürgen Hoyer *Institute of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
University of Basel · CHTU Dresden · DESchweizerische Ärztegesellschaft für Psycholytische Therapie · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Post-event processing (PEP) after social interactions (SIs) contributes to the persistence of social phobia (SP). This study investigated whether PEP as a transdiagnostic process also occurs in major depressive disorder (MDD) and controls. We also tested to what extent PEP was explained by trait levels of social anxiety (SA) or depression. Method: For seven days, a total of n = 165 patients (n = 47 SP, n = 118 MDD) and n = 119 controls completed five surveys per day on their smartphones. Event-based experience sampling was used. PEP was assessed following subjective embarrassment in SIs with two reliable items from the Post-Event Processing Questionnaire. Data were analysed via multilevel regression analyses. Results: Individuals with SP or MDD experienced more embarrassing SIs than controls and, accordingly, more PEP. The relative frequency of PEP after embarrassing SIs was equally high in all groups (86-96%). The groups did not differ regarding the amount of time PEP was experienced. After controlling trait depression, embarrassment occurred more frequently only in SP compared to controls. When controlling trait SA, between-group differences in indications of embarrassment, and consequently in PEP, dissipated. Conclusions: PEP could be interpreted as a common coping strategy among all individuals, while more frequent embarrassment might be specific for clinical groups. Embarrassment was primarily driven by SA. The alleviation of SA could lead to the reduction of embarrassment and, further, of PEP. On this basis, a model describing PEP in MDD is proposed, while current models of PEP in SP are complemented.

Indexed as

depressionembarrassmentexperience samplingpost-event processingsocial anxietytransdiagnostic processes

Identifiers

PMID36398063
PMCPMC9645469
OpenAlexW3114758963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.