ArticleJournal of Taibah University Medical Sciences2023
The management of retroperitoneal sarcoma: The experience of a single institution and a review of the literature.
Article in Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Global trends in retroperitoneal sarcomas surgery: a bibliometric analysis from 2005 to 2024.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Analysis of recurrence and metastasis patterns and prognosis after complete resection of retroperitoneal liposarcoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPSs) are rare mesenchymal tumors. The objective of this study was to discuss the different clinical, therapeutic and prognostic aspects of RPS in our institution. Methods: This was a retrospective study conducted at the Department of Medical Oncology in the Habib Bourguiba University Hospital in Sfax, including 19 patients who were treated for RPSs between 1999 and 2016. Results: The median age was 49 years (range: 18-83 years); 68.4% of the patients were female. The commonest symptom was abdominal pain (88%) and the median tumor size was 15 cm (range: 4-30 cm). Complete resection was achieved in only five cases (26.3%). The most common histological subtypes were liposarcoma (47.4%) and leiomyosarcoma (26.3%). Eight patients had a high-grade tumor (G2 = 2 or G3 = 6). Adjuvant radiotherapy was administered in 5 patients (26%). Seventeen patients were treated with chemotherapy; six received chemotherapy in an adjuvant treatment, three as a neoadjuvant treatment, and eight were treated during the palliative phase. Relapse was observed in 58% of cases. For all patients, the overall survival (OS) was 89.5% at 1 year and 40.3% at 5 years. Prognostic factors influencing OS were sex ( Conclusion: We showed that the treatment of RPSs relies on surgery with complete resection. Other factors, such as radiotherapy and the occurrence of relapse, also have an impact on OS. To facilitate surgery and to obtain negative resection margins, preoperative radiotherapy is indicated in selected patients with a high risk of relapse. Further prospective trials are warranted to select optimal therapies with less toxicity and better efficacy in reducing recurrences, mainly at a local level.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.