Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36397997›Full record

ReviewEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM2022

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Acupuncture Treatment for Oral Ulcer.

Hang Yan, Tianxi Chen, Yuling Zuo, Yang Tu, Huangping Ai, Yuqi Lin, Yongcan Chen

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Hang YanZhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4106-2115
Tianxi ChenZhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Yuling ZuoHospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Yang TuChengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6587-4791
Huangping AiHospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Yuqi LinZhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Yongcan ChenTongde Hospital of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6597-2992
Zhejiang Chinese Medical University · CNChengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CNTongde Hospital of Zhejiang Province · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Oral ulcer (OU) is a common oral mucosal disease manifested with obvious pain. In some studies, the efficacy of acupuncture in OU has been confirmed, but systematic reviews and meta-analyses for them are lacking. Our aim is to evaluate the efficacy of acupuncture in the treatment of OU. Methods: We searched the literature from eight databases from their inception to December 2021. We included randomized controlled trials of acupuncture for the treatment of oral ulcer. The meta-analysis was carried out using Review Manager 5.3 and Stata 16.0. The main outcomes were the effective rate and the recurrence rate, the secondary outcomes were the visual analogue score (VAS) and the ulcer healing time. Results: Totally, 18 studies were finally included in the meta-analysis, including 1,422 patients. In meta-analyses, we found that in comparison with Western medicine, acupuncture can improve effective rate (OR = 5.40, 95% CI: 3.40 to 8.58), reduce the ulcer recurrence rate (OR = 0.21, 95% CI: 0.13 to 0.33), and relieve the ulcer pain (MD = -2.26, 95% CI: -4.27to-0.24). In addition, compared with Western medicine, acupuncture plus Western medicine also can improve effective rate (OR = 2.95, 95% CI: 1.48 to 5.85). Compared with the Chinese medicine, the acupuncture plus Chinese medicine can improve the effective rate (OR = 8.26, 95% CI: 3.61 to 18.88) and relieve the ulcer pain (MD = -1.85, 95% CI: -2.51 to -1.19). Conclusion: Acupuncture may be more effective than Western medicine in terms of efficacy rate, and acupuncture combined with Western or Chinese medicine may have the potential to reduce the recurrence of ulcer and relieve the ulcer pain. However, due to limited evidence, higher quality and more rigorously designed clinical trials with larger sample sizes will be needed to further confirm our findings.

Identifiers

PMID36397997
PMCPMC9666018
OpenAlexW4308579229

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.