Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36397954›Full record

ArticleClinical psychology in Europe2021

Looking on the Bright Side Reduces Worry in Pregnancy: Training Interpretations in Pregnant Women.

Colette R Hirsch, Frances Meeten, Jill M Newby, Sophie O'Halloran, Calum Gordon, Hannah Krzyzanowski, Michelle L Moulds

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical psychology in Europe, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Colette R Hirsch *Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3579-2418
Frances Meeten *School of Psychology, University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom.
Jill M NewbySchool of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Sophie O'HalloranInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Calum GordonInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Hannah KrzyzanowskiInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Michelle L MouldsSchool of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
King's College London · GBBlack Dog Institute · AUUniversity of Sussex · GBUNSW Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Recent evidence suggests that anxiety is more common than depression in the perinatal period, however there are few interventions available to treat perinatal anxiety. Targeting specific processes that maintain anxiety, such as worry, may be one potentially promising way to reduce anxiety in this period. Given evidence that negative interpretation bias maintains worry, we tested whether interpretation bias could be modified, and whether this in turn would lead to less negative thought (i.e., worry) intrusions, in pregnant women with high levels of worry. Method: Participants (N = 49, at least 16 weeks gestation) were randomly assigned to either an interpretation modification condition (CBM-I) which involved training in accessing positive meanings of emotionally ambiguous scenarios, or an active control condition in which the scenarios remained ambiguous and unresolved. Results: Relative to the control condition, participants in the CBM-I condition generated significantly more positive interpretations and experienced significantly less negative thought intrusions. Conclusions: Our findings indicate that worry is a modifiable risk factor during pregnancy, and that it is possible to induce a positive interpretation bias in pregnant women experiencing high levels of worry. Although preliminary, our findings speak to exciting clinical possibilities for the treatment of worry and the prevention of perinatal anxiety.

Indexed as

anxietycognitive bias mediation (CBM)interpretation biasperinatal mental healthpregnancyworry

Identifiers

PMID36397954
PMCPMC9667128
OpenAlexW4234158596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.