ArticleCureus2022
Breast Imaging Findings in Dermatofibrosarcoma Protuberans: A Case Report and Review of Literature.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Advances in non-invasive imaging for dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans: A review.The Australasian journal of dermatology · 2024Review
- Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans of the breast in pregnancy.Journal of surgical case reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP) is a rare, indolent, cutaneous sarcoma originating in the dermis, and although nearly half of cases occur on the trunk, DFSP of the breast is exceedingly rare, and imaging findings may resemble primary breast neoplasms. In this case report, a previously healthy, middle-aged female patient presented to the clinic with the complaint of abnormal growth in her left breast, which had been gradually increasing in size over the course of four years. Imaging of the left breast demonstrated a large, exophytic, partially intradermal mass with internal vascularity, raising concern for a primary breast neoplasm. Ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy revealed a diagnosis of DFSP. She underwent successful left skin- and nipple-sparing mastectomy with complete resection of the mass with negative margins confirmed on surgical pathology. Recognizing key features of DFSP on conventional breast imaging modalities, such as mammography and ultrasound, can be helpful in differentiating DFSP from primary breast neoplasms, but imaging findings alone may be nonspecific and biopsy is necessary for a definitive diagnosis. On mammography, DFSP typically presents as an exophytic, gently lobulated, non-calcified, and circumscribed mass. On sonographic examination, DFSP appears as a circumscribed, parallel-oriented mass that is hypoechoic relative to the surrounding fat, with intervening echogenic bands, posterior acoustic enhancement, and intralesional hypervascularity visualized on color Doppler. Although DFSP is slow-growing with a low incidence of metastatic disease, it has a high local recurrence rate and aggressive local resection is necessary to minimize the chance of recurrence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.