Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36397748›Full record

ArticleClinical psychology in Europe2022

Perceived Criticism and Family Attitudes as Predictors of Recurrence in Bipolar Disorder.

Claudia Lex, Martin Hautzinger, Thomas D Meyer

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical psychology in Europe, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Claudia LexDepartment of Psychiatry, Villach General Hospital, Villach, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4523-3580
Martin HautzingerDepartment Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Eberhard Karls University Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6082-2602
Thomas D MeyerMcGovern Medical School, Louis A. Faillace, MD, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Texas HSC at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4236-7778
University of Klagenfurt · ATUniversity of Tübingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Bipolar disorder (BD) is a highly recurrent psychiatric condition. While combined pharmacological and psychosocial treatments improve outcomes, not much is known about potential moderators that could affect these treatments. One potential moderator might be the quality of interpersonal relations in families, for example, familial attitudes and perceived criticism. Method: To explore this question we conducted a post-hoc analysis that used an existing data set from a previous study by our group that compared cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and supporting therapy (ST) in remitted BD. In the present study, we used Cox proportional hazard models. Results: We found that the relatives' ratings of criticism predicted the likelihood of depressive recurrences, especially in the ST condition. The patients' ratings of negative familial attitudes predicted the risk of recurrences in general, irrespective of the therapy condition. Conclusion: These results suggest that it might be important to assess perceived criticism and familial attitudes as potential moderators of treatment outcome in BD.

Indexed as

bipolar disordercognitive behavioral therapyexpressed emotionfamilyillness courseperceived criticismpsychotherapy

Identifiers

PMID36397748
PMCPMC9667347
OpenAlexW4220698696

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.