Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36397178›Full record

ArticleBMC psychology2022

"In the office nine to five, five days a week… those days are gone": qualitative exploration of diplomatic personnel's experiences of remote working during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Samantha K Brooks, Charlotte E Hall, Dipti Patel, Neil Greenberg

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Teleworking Effects on Mental Health-A Systematic Review and a Research Agenda.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Occupational well-being of diplomatic personnel: a qualitative study.Occupational medicine (Oxford, England) · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Samantha K BrooksDepartment of Psychological Medicine, King's College London, Weston Education Centre, London, SE5 9RJ, UK. samantha.k.brooks@kcl.ac.uk.
Charlotte E HallBehavioural Science and Insights Unit, Emergency Response Department Science and Technology, UK Health Security Agency, Porton Down, Salisbury, SP4 0JG, UK.
Dipti PatelForeign, Commonwealth and Development Office, King Charles Street, London, SW1A 2AH, UK.
Neil GreenbergDepartment of Psychological Medicine, King's College London, Weston Education Centre, London, SE5 9RJ, UK.
King's College London · GBForeign, Commonwealth & Development OfficeUK Health Security Agency

Funding

National Institute for Health and Care Research Health Protection Research Unit (NIHR HPRU) in Emergency Preparedness and Response NIHR200890
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany employees had to work remotely during the COVID-19 pandemic. Literature suggests there are both challenges and benefits to remote working and that remote working can have detrimental effects on mental health. This study aimed to explore diplomatic personnel's perceptions and experiences of working from home during the pandemic.

methodsTwenty-five employees of the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office took part in semi-structured interviews. Thematic analysis was carried out to extract recurring themes from the data.

resultsSeven main themes emerged from the data: impact of the pandemic on work; relationships with colleagues; benefits of working from home; challenges of working from home; family; moving posts during the pandemic; and perceptions and predictions of post-pandemic work. Participants provided mixed views on how remote working had affected productivity and relationships with colleagues. Benefits of working from home included greater freedom and flexibility; new opportunities; and inclusivity of remote meetings. Challenges included being in different time zones to the countries they were working for; unsuitable home ergonomics; technological issues; and difficulties finding appropriate work-life balance. Those with young children reported difficulties juggling work and childcare. Adjusting to new posts at a time when staff were working remotely appeared particularly challenging. However, most did not want or expect to return to entirely office-based work. They predicted a hybrid model of working in the future, involving both office work and remote work; they stressed the importance of flexibility and suggested there would not be a one-size-fits-all approach to returning to face-to-face work.

conclusionsRemote working during the COVID-19 pandemic has changed the ways in which employees work, showing them that they do not have to be in the office to successfully achieve their work goals and leaving many wanting flexibility to make their own decisions about working from home (or not). There are both benefits and challenges to remote working; managers can take steps to reduce some of the challenges by being available to support their employees, organising regular remote meetings and allowing employees autonomy in terms of when and where they work.

Indexed as

COVID-19TeleworkingChildChild, PreschoolHumansMental HealthPandemicsCOVID-19Diplomatic personnelDiplomatsPandemicRemote workingWorking from home

Identifiers

PMID36397178
PMCPMC9670069
OpenAlexW4309512513

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.