Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36397169›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2022

Modulation of the porcine intestinal microbiota in the course of Ascaris suum infection.

Andrea Springer, Liane Wagner, Sarina Koehler, Stefanie Klinger, Gerhard Breves, Dagmar A Brüggemann, Christina Strube

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Virulence · 2026
    Article
  2. Parasites & vectors · 2026
    Article
  3. AdultCurrent research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. ConcurrentmSphere · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Andrea SpringerInstitute for Parasitology, Centre for Infection Medicine, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Buenteweg 17, 30559, Hanover, Germany.
Liane WagnerInstitute for Parasitology, Centre for Infection Medicine, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Buenteweg 17, 30559, Hanover, Germany.
Sarina KoehlerInstitute for Parasitology, Centre for Infection Medicine, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Buenteweg 17, 30559, Hanover, Germany.
Stefanie KlingerInstitute for Physiology and Cell Biology, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Bischofsholer Damm 15, 30173, Hanover, Germany.
Gerhard BrevesInstitute for Physiology and Cell Biology, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Bischofsholer Damm 15, 30173, Hanover, Germany.
Dagmar A BrüggemannDepartment of Safety and Quality of Meat, Max Rubner-Institut, Federal Research Institute of Nutrition and Food, E.-C.-Baumann-Straße 20, 95326, Kulmbach, Germany.
Christina StrubeInstitute for Parasitology, Centre for Infection Medicine, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Buenteweg 17, 30559, Hanover, Germany. Christina.strube@tiho-hannover.de.
University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation · DEMax Rubner Institut · DE

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft STR 1171/16-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe porcine roundworm Ascaris suum impairs feed conversion and weight gain, but its effects on intestinal microbiota remain largely unexplored.

methodsModulation of the intestinal microbiota was assessed in pigs that were infected once with 10,000 A. suum eggs and pigs that received a trickle infection (1000 eggs/day over 10 days), compared with a non-infected control group. Six pigs each were sacrificed per group at days 21, 35 and 49 post-infection (p.i.). Faecal samples taken weekly until slaughter and ingesta samples from different intestinal compartments were subjected to next-generation sequencing of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene.

resultsThe results revealed marked differences between the single- and the trickle-infected group. Single infection caused a remarkable but transient decrease in microbial diversity in the caecum, which was not observed in the trickle-infected group. However, an increase in short-chain fatty acid-producing genera in the caecum on day 21 p.i., which shifted to a decrease on day 35 p.i., was common to both groups, possibly related to changes in excretory-secretory products following the parasite's final moult. Faecal microbial interaction networks were more similar between the single-infected and control group than the trickle-infected group. In addition, a lower degree of similarity over time indicated that A. suum trickle infection prevented microbiota stabilization.

conclusionsThese different patterns may have important implications regarding the comparability of experimental infections with natural scenarios characterized by continuous exposure, and should be confirmed by further studies.

Indexed as

AscariasisAscaris suumGastrointestinal MicrobiomeSwineSwine DiseasesAnimalsRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16SAscaridsIntestinal microbiotaMicrobiomeNetwork analysisRoundwormsShort-chain fatty acidsTrickle infection

Identifiers

PMID36397169
PMCPMC9673396
OpenAlexW4309511558

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.