ArticleResearch involvement and engagement2022
Exploring the "how" in research partnerships with young partners by experience: lessons learned in six projects from Canada, the Netherlands, and the United Kingdom.
Article in Research involvement and engagement, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- 'There has to be some chemistry there': an interpretive description exploring the experiences, motivations and dynamics of partnered child health research.Research involvement and engagement · 2025Article
- Engaging children, young adults, and other partners to identify priorities for sport related concussion research.Research involvement and engagement · 2025Article
- Incorporating children's voices in healthcare: adoptPaediatrics & child health · 2025Article
- Distinguishing participants, patients and the public: implications of different institutional settings on engagement approaches.Research involvement and engagement · 2025Article
- Experiences, impact, and enablers of involving young people and family caregivers in developing reporting guidelines for paediatric randomised trials: a case study.Research involvement and engagement · 2025Article
- The co-development and pilot evaluation of the Siblings Training, Empowerment, and Advocacy Kit (Siblings TEAKit) to support youth and young adult siblings of individuals with a disability: A participatory action research qualitative study protocol.Research involvement and engagement · 2025Article
- Bridging the gap: reflections on co-creation in knowledge translation.Research involvement and engagement · 2024Article
- Conducting Patient-Oriented Research in Pediatric Populations: A Narrative Review.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Patient and public involvement in the development of the digital tool MyBoT to support communication between young people with a chronic condition and care providers.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024Article
- Navigating meaningful engagement: lessons from partnering with youth and families in brain-based disability research.Research involvement and engagement · 2024Article
- A case study of using community-based consensus methods to facilitate shared decision-making among a spinal cord injury network.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2024Review
- The INSCHOOL project: showcasing participatory qualitative methods derived from patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) work with young people with long-term health conditions.Research involvement and engagement · 2023Article
- Youth and family involvement in the development of a plain language trial results communication tool: CommuniKIDS.Research involvement and engagement · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundInvolvement of young partners by experience in research is on the rise and becoming expected practice. However, literature on how to promote equitable and meaningful involvement of young people is scarce. The purpose of this paper is to describe and reflect on different approaches between researchers and young partners by experience based on six research projects conducted in Canada, Netherlands, and United Kingdom.
methodsFrom six exemplar research projects, at least one researcher and one young partner by experience were asked to collaboratively (1) describe the project; (2) summarise the values and practicalities of the project; and (3) reflect on their partnership. Thematic analysis was applied to the findings from these reflective exercises, which included meeting summaries, recordings, and notes.
resultsAll projects shared similar values, including mutual respect between all team members. Young partners were offered a variety of opportunities and approaches to being involved, for example in recruiting participants, co-analysing or (co-)presenting results. Supports were provided to the teams in a variety of ways, including organizing accessible meetings and having dedicated facilitators. Regular and proactive communication was encouraged by using asynchronous modes of communication, establishing reference documents, and a personal approach by facilitators. Facilitators aimed to tailor the needs of all team members by continuously discussing their preferred roles in the project. While most projects did not offer formal research training, various learning and skill development opportunities were provided throughout, including presenting skills or advocacy training.
conclusionWith this paper, we demonstrated the value of reflection, and we invite others to reflect on their partnerships and share their lessons learned. Our recommendations for involvement of young people in research are: (1) Remember that it is okay to not know what the partnership might look like and there is no single recipe of how to partner; (2) Take the time to invest in partnerships; (3) Provide ongoing opportunities to reflect on partnerships; (4) Consider how to balance the power dynamics; and (5) Consider how to incorporate diversity in the background of young partners in research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.