Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36397100›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2022

Automatic ovarian tumors recognition system based on ensemble convolutional neural network with ultrasound imaging.

Shih-Tien Hsu, Yu-Jie Su, Chian-Huei Hung, Ming-Jer Chen, Chien-Hsing Lu, Chih-En Kuo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Shih-Tien HsuDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, No. 1650 Sec. 4 Taiwan Blvd. Xitun Dist., Taichung, 407, Taiwan.
Yu-Jie SuMaster's Program of Biomedical Infomatics and Biomedical Engineering, Feng Chia University, No. 100 Wenhua Rd. Xitun Dist., Taichung, 407, Taiwan.
Chian-Huei HungDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, No. 1650 Sec. 4 Taiwan Blvd. Xitun Dist., Taichung, 407, Taiwan.
Ming-Jer ChenDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, No. 1650 Sec. 4 Taiwan Blvd. Xitun Dist., Taichung, 407, Taiwan.
Chien-Hsing LuDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, No. 1650 Sec. 4 Taiwan Blvd. Xitun Dist., Taichung, 407, Taiwan.
Chih-En KuoDepartment of Applied Mathematics, National Chung Hsing University, No. 145, Xingda Rd., South Dist., Taichung, 402, Taiwan. cekuo@nchu.edu.tw.ORCID 0000-0001-6305-205X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUpon the discovery of ovarian cysts, obstetricians, gynecologists, and ultrasound examiners must address the common clinical challenge of distinguishing between benign and malignant ovarian tumors. Numerous types of ovarian tumors exist, many of which exhibit similar characteristics that increase the ambiguity in clinical diagnosis. Using deep learning technology, we aimed to develop a method that rapidly and accurately assists the different diagnosis of ovarian tumors in ultrasound images.

methodsBased on deep learning method, we used ten well-known convolutional neural network models (e.g., Alexnet, GoogleNet, and ResNet) for training of transfer learning. To ensure method stability and robustness, we repeated the random sampling of the training and validation data ten times. The mean of the ten test results was set as the final assessment data. After the training process was completed, the three models with the highest ratio of calculation accuracy to time required for classification were used for ensemble learning pertaining. Finally, the interpretation results of the ensemble classifier were used as the final results. We also applied ensemble gradient-weighted class activation mapping (Grad-CAM) technology to visualize the decision-making results of the models.

resultsThe highest mean accuracy, mean sensitivity, and mean specificity of ten single CNN models were 90.51 ± 4.36%, 89.77 ± 4.16%, and 92.00 ± 5.95%, respectively. The mean accuracy, mean sensitivity, and mean specificity of the ensemble classifier method were 92.15 ± 2.84%, 91.37 ± 3.60%, and 92.92 ± 4.00%, respectively. The performance of the ensemble classifier is better than that of a single classifier in three evaluation metrics. Moreover, the standard deviation is also better which means the ensemble classifier is more stable and robust.

conclusionFrom the comprehensive perspective of data quantity, data diversity, robustness of validation strategy, and overall accuracy, the proposed method outperformed the methods used in previous studies. In future studies, we will continue to increase the number of authenticated images and apply our proposed method in clinical settings to increase its robustness and reliability.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerOvarian NeoplasmsDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansReproducibility of ResultsUltrasonographyConvolution neural networkEnsemble learningGrad-CAMOvarian tumorUltrasound diagnosis

Identifiers

PMID36397100
PMCPMC9673368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.