ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2022
Automatic ovarian tumors recognition system based on ensemble convolutional neural network with ultrasound imaging.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Artificial Intelligence Applied to Ultrasound Diagnosis of Pelvic Gynecological Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Gynecologic and obstetric investigation · 2026Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence for ovarian cancer diagnosis via ultrasound: a systematic review and quantitative assessment of model performance.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Pooled it
- Development and validation of an ultrasound-based deep learning radiomics nomogram for predicting the malignant risk of ovarian tumours.Biomedical engineering online · 2024Trial
- Investigation of multimodal deep learning models for predicting ovarian tumor malignancy based on ultrasound images and clinical information - a comprehensive comparative study against readers and O-RADS.BMC medical imaging · 2026Article
- A Deep Learning Approach for Classifying Benign, Malignant, and Borderline Ovarian Tumors Using Convolutional Neural Networks and Generative Adversarial Networks.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A multicenter deep learning framework integrating radiomics and vision transformers for comprehensive ovarian tumor analysis from ultrasound imaging.European journal of medical research · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Ultrasound-Based Diagnoses of Gynecological Tumors: A Systematic Review.Cureus · 2025Review
- Advancements in artificial intelligence for ultrasound diagnosis of ovarian cancer: a comprehensive review.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- Fusion model combining ultrasound-based radiomics and deep transfer learning with clinical parameters for preoperative prediction of pelvic lymph node metastasis in cervical cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Development and validation of a deep learning pipeline to diagnose ovarian masses using ultrasound screening: a retrospective multicenter study.EClinicalMedicine · 2024Article
- Equipping computational pathology systems with artifact processing pipelines: a showcase for computation and performance trade-offs.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2024Article
- Intelligent system based on multiple networks for accurate ovarian tumor semantic segmentation.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Enhancing Ovarian Tumor Diagnosis: Performance of Convolutional Neural Networks in Classifying Ovarian Masses Using Ultrasound Images.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Ultrasound-based deep learning radiomics model for differentiating benign, borderline, and malignant ovarian tumours: a multi-class classification exploratory study.BMC medical imaging · 2024Article
- Toward Smart, Automated Junctional Tourniquets-AI Models to Interpret Vessel Occlusion at Physiological Pressure Points.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Deep learning models for interpretation of point of care ultrasound in military working dogs.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2024Article
- Evolving the Era of 5D Ultrasound? A Systematic Literature Review on the Applications for Artificial Intelligence Ultrasound Imaging in Obstetrics and Gynecology.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- RETRACTED: Gynecological Healthcare: Unveiling Pelvic Masses Classification through Evolutionary Gravitational Neocognitron Neural Network Optimized with Nomadic People Optimizer.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUpon the discovery of ovarian cysts, obstetricians, gynecologists, and ultrasound examiners must address the common clinical challenge of distinguishing between benign and malignant ovarian tumors. Numerous types of ovarian tumors exist, many of which exhibit similar characteristics that increase the ambiguity in clinical diagnosis. Using deep learning technology, we aimed to develop a method that rapidly and accurately assists the different diagnosis of ovarian tumors in ultrasound images.
methodsBased on deep learning method, we used ten well-known convolutional neural network models (e.g., Alexnet, GoogleNet, and ResNet) for training of transfer learning. To ensure method stability and robustness, we repeated the random sampling of the training and validation data ten times. The mean of the ten test results was set as the final assessment data. After the training process was completed, the three models with the highest ratio of calculation accuracy to time required for classification were used for ensemble learning pertaining. Finally, the interpretation results of the ensemble classifier were used as the final results. We also applied ensemble gradient-weighted class activation mapping (Grad-CAM) technology to visualize the decision-making results of the models.
resultsThe highest mean accuracy, mean sensitivity, and mean specificity of ten single CNN models were 90.51 ± 4.36%, 89.77 ± 4.16%, and 92.00 ± 5.95%, respectively. The mean accuracy, mean sensitivity, and mean specificity of the ensemble classifier method were 92.15 ± 2.84%, 91.37 ± 3.60%, and 92.92 ± 4.00%, respectively. The performance of the ensemble classifier is better than that of a single classifier in three evaluation metrics. Moreover, the standard deviation is also better which means the ensemble classifier is more stable and robust.
conclusionFrom the comprehensive perspective of data quantity, data diversity, robustness of validation strategy, and overall accuracy, the proposed method outperformed the methods used in previous studies. In future studies, we will continue to increase the number of authenticated images and apply our proposed method in clinical settings to increase its robustness and reliability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.